I think rulers would benefit from it if they claimed that they were chosen by gods to be the rulers because then the people would be more respectful and treat the rulers with utmost loyalty. More power because people din't want the gods fury.
I think rulers would benefit from it if they claimed that they were chosen by gods to be the rulers because then the people would be more respectful and treat the rulers with utmost loyalty. More power because people din't want the gods fury.
priests occupied a high level in sumers social hierarchy the division of society by rank or class.in fact priests were just below kings.the kings of sumer claimed that they had been chosen by gods to rule
Rulers would benefit if they claimed to be chosen by a higher power because it would legitimize their authority in the eyes of their subjects. This divine right theory has been historically used to justify absolute rule and discourage rebellion. By presenting themselves as chosen by a higher power, rulers could also consolidate their power and maintain control over their territories.
i dont know what the answer is. i was trying to find out the answer too. me too i was trying to figure this out
Rulers in Maya society were typically chosen through a system of hereditary succession, with leadership passing down within ruling families. Often, the eldest son of the ruler would be designated as the heir. Additionally, rulers were also expected to demonstrate certain qualities, such as bravery in battle and strong leadership skills, to maintain their position.
it was chosen by "god". the first born son of the pharaoh would be pharaoh next in line because it is believed that the first born son is chosen by god.
Rulers would feel ambivalent about the Enlightenment because it promoted ideas of freedom, individual rights, and limited government, which could challenge their absolute power and authority. On the other hand, the Enlightenment also produced ideas that could benefit rulers, such as promoting reason, education, and efficiency in government.
Wooden rulers would be "reglas." Governing rulers would be "gobernantes" (governors).
6+9=69
‘Profits’ is the wrong term. The vast majority of people would benefit from a Socialist world, with no rulers or classes or poverty or war.
You wouldn't get less money than you would if you claimed yourself. However if claim someone else you would expect more money, especially if you are claiming children. Being claimed as a dependent is a good thing a benefit. Anyone can only be claimed ONCE. That once can be on your own return, or on someone elses. If someone else claims you, so you can't on your own, your tax due (refund available), if any - will be changed by the loss of that deduction. (Pay more or refund less).
It would take about 21 foot rulers.