0
Why would some Christian's disagree with some of the human rights?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Because religions want to control peoples lives and if they are given full human rights they might do things their religion says is wrong.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why do people disagree with the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
I didn't know anyone in their right mind would disagree with it.
Why are human rights import to Christians?
it is asked by god in the bible as it promotes community cohesion and providing and following the laws of human rights would support this therefore christians give alot of importance towards the issue of human rights. faiza x
What would all christians disagree with genetic engineering being used for?
its playing god
Do Christians disagree with Mark's Gospel?
A:Most Christians believe that the entire Bible is true, including Mark's Gospel. Since Mark is now known to have been the earliest New Testament gospel and that the other gospels were substantially based on Mark, either directly (Matthew and Luke) or indirectly (John), to disagree with Mark's Gospel on important issues would probably be to disagree with the gospels as a whole, which few Christians would do. Of course, there are minor errors in Mark that the subsequent evangelists recognised and corrected, but these are not substantive.
Is God a manifestation of human need for hope?
Some people may believe that God is a manifestation for man's need to hope for a better place after we're done here. Many Christians would disagree and believe God is a real, living being.
What effects do internationalism have on human rights?
Contributions have been made in the field of human rights by the UN, an organisation which embodies the ideals of internationalism.An example of thiss would be the universal declaration of human rights.
How is racism a violation of human rights?
In the broadest sense, it is a human rights violation not to treat a human being like a human being. Racism is the intentional relegation of an ethnic community to a sub-human state, and thus is not, eo ipso, a "violation" of human rights, but it *is* indicative of an attitude which would *want* to violate human rights.
What rights would a cloned human have?
The same as the original.
What rights and priviliges do they have in Mexico?
Mexico is a Federal Presidential Representative Republic, signatory of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In terms of rights and privileges, it has the same most western democracies have.
Who made the human rights?
If you live in the United States of America, human rights are clearly stated in the Constitution, as well as the amendments (part of the Constitution. However, the most common place to find human rights is in "The Bill of Rights". So, to answer your question (of who decides human rights) that would mostly be the legislature in this country. But those are only the cases that make it to the supreme court. Also, some human rights are specific to the state you live in. (Such as abortion, legalization of marijuana, licensing, human limitation, etc...,) Although most human rights are permanent and universally understood, there are groups of people called "Human Rights Activists" that fight for the legalization of abortion and things like that.
Would you support economic sanctions against a country that violates human rights?
Yes, because everyone is equal, if the country is taking human rights away from people, that is not God's will.
Can you use disagree a sentence?
I would disagree with that last statement.
