0
Why would the fossils of an ocean fish found on two diffrent continents would not be good evidence of continental drift?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Fossil of an ocean fish found on two different continents would not be good evidence of continental drift because Fossils of land animals are a better piece of evidence of continental drift than fish.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoBecause it's a SEAbird, so it could have traveled over the sea. A land bound animal would be good evidence because it wouldn't have been able to travel across the ocean.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoA fish could swim from one side of the ocean to the other, and they often do.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did Alfred wegener come up with the continental drift theory?
he had evidence from the mountain range that were there. and that the same fossils were found in the different continents.
How can you explain the fossils after continental drift?
the same fossils were found on different continents
Used as evidence for continental drift?
There are four things that are used for evidence for the continental drift. The four continental drift was Shape of continents, fossil evidence, glacial evidence and similar rocks found in different continents.
Evidence for continental drift?
The existence in the fossil record of the same land species on several continents. Since these animals are not seafaring then the continents must have been connected at one time. Also continental drift is supported by vast empirical evidence.
How fossils provide evidence for the Continental drift?
The scientists that found the fossils found that were found on different continents. Some of the same fossil were located on each Continent that could only survive in one climate. Therefore, a fossil provided some evidence for the continental drift to be true.
How can fossils help show that continental drift happened?
It can help show that continental drift happened, if you find the same fossils on different continents. This would mean that the continents had to be close together if the fossils are found on land.
Are fossils evidence of continental drift?
Yes.
What evidence is there that the continents were joined together at one time?
Evidence supporting the concept of continental drift and the past existence of a supercontinent includes the fit of the continents' coastlines, similarities in rock formations and fossils across currently separated continents, matching mountain ranges on different continents, and the distribution of certain ancient climate-sensitive rock formations like glacial deposits. Additionally, paleomagnetic data from rocks indicate the past movement of continents.
Paleontologists noticed that these were the same on different continents even though the continents were separated by ocean?
The same rocks and minerals from the same batch, dinosaur fossils dating back to the same time periods, natural landforms and structures can be found on completely separate continents. This evidence supports the Plate Techtonics and Continental Drift theories.
What are two forms of evidence used to support the continental drift theory?
The first one is fossils and the second is the unusual jigsaw puzzle of the continents when they were put together.
What was Alfred wegeners evidence?
fossils continents shapes climate :)
The presence of the same on several continents supports the hypothesis of continental drift.?
Yes, the presence of the same organisms on multiple continents suggests that at some point in the past, those continents were connected. This supports the theory of continental drift, which explains how landmasses have moved over time. The distribution of these similar organisms across different continents provides additional evidence for this theory.
