Want this question answered?
yes
Yes, because a line graph deals with change over time, and so does height.
yes
The independent variable - if there is one. A variable that is common to a number of pairs of variables that you wish to compare. For example, if you want to compare height and mass at various ages, the age would be on the x-axis.
It is not a suitable form of graph. A circle graph can be used for showing the relationship between a variable and its component parts. It is not suitable for illustrating changes with height.
Look at the equation for kinetic energy.It is clear that relation between mass and kinetic energy is linear (you would get a straight line on the graph), while the relation between speed and kinetic energy is quadratic (you would get a curve, specifically a parabola).
Line graph. I would suggest a scatter graph. That would allow you to determine the line of best fit.
Line graph
months* I think the best choice would be a line graph since line graphs are known to display data that changes over time. In your question the mass probably changes throughout an owl's life. This info would show clearly in a line graph since the mass changes.
The slop of a line which represents mass over volume would give you density.
If you only have the speed/time graph, you can't calculate force out of it. You could if you also knew the mass of the object that's speeding along, but not with the speed alone.
yes
Yes, because a line graph deals with change over time, and so does height.
Yes, because a line graph deals with change over time, and so does height.
yes
mass and volume measurements for any sample liquid should fall along the graph line because liquids have a constant density. Density is mass over volume. Mass equals density which is a constant time volume.
Density is the slope of the line. density = mass/volume = constant. Since mass and volume have a linear relationship, then that constant is also the slope of the line on a graph of a comparison of mass to volume ratios.