Nope. Galileo proved that the weight of an object has nothing to do with how fast it falls, particularly in a container with no air in it.
In one of these airless containers, you would see that a nickel and a feather fall at exactly the same speed.
Because the smaller you are the faster you breath
fatter person land faster
yes
I would say it depends on the location, where the deterioration rate is faster or how much stress it is on that piece of land. If the total area of the land is large it will probably deteriorate faster, then those of the smaller land. It actually depends on the pressure that is put up on that certain crust. If the pressure is strong enough it will cause an earthquake, or other calamities in a certain location.
The land mass is heavier even tough the sea covers 2/3 of the earth's surface it still has land under the sea hence it is heavier... == == == == Land mass will be heavier than water because it is more dense
Assuming both individuals have the same jumping ability and initial velocity, the person who is heavier would land first due to gravity pulling them down faster. The force of gravity is directly proportional to an object's mass, so the heavier person would accelerate more quickly towards the ground compared to the lighter person.
The land warms faster
That would be an island.
There are so many things that would be different. In fact, life may cease to exist. The biggest change would be smaller tides and the earth's ocean volume would be smaller. There would be less ocean and more land.
The cheetah is the fastest land animal and would easily beat a rabbit in a race.
the probability is actually not quite even. It would actually land heads 495 out of 1000 times because the heads side is slightly heavier
Smaller bodies of salt water usually surrounded by land are called seas. An example would be the Dead Sea between Israel and Jordan.