No. It would have a magnification of 400. The resolution is not directly related to the magnification. It could be higher or lower.
40X.
The object would be more clear or more blurry.
The object would be more clear or more blurry.
You would expect to see a silhouette of the figure because it is too thick. -Franceska Biology Major
scanning electron microscope
the plant is a mineral that has only two or some times three seeds to each pod and that is why you would need a microscope to see the small microscopic seeds
-It enlarges objects and materials to a different magnification level where you would be able to observe them better in a different point of view.
ultraviolet light.
The resolution of an optical microscope is not better (or worse) when using natural light. Resolution is determined by the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective.Why a vacuum in an electron microscope?The molecules that make up air would scatter the electrons in the electron beam
the stage on a microscope is where you would place the object being microscoped. you would put the object lets just say a leaf, on the flat part with lenses above
*A microscope magnifies because if it enlarged an object, it would make the object under the microscope physically bigger. *Magnifying just makes it appear bigger than it actually is.
A scanning electron microscope would be the best choice because the electron microscope can achieve a much greater resolution than that obtained with the light microscope because the wavelength of electrons is shorter than that of light.
Increasing the magnification of the object does not necessarily lead to a more satisfying result because magnification that is increased beyond a certain point can result to lost resolution. Magnification can be done by using instruments such as a magnifying glass, a microscope, and a telescope.
when there is an object that is very small, and when you need to look closer into it.
A microscope would fit that description.
40X.
It rather depends on how deeply you wish to view the object. An optical microscope is adequate for most studies. But, with an electron microscope, not only could you view a flea in detail, but also the minute hairs on the flea's legs