0
What else can I help you with?
Are particles of carbon almost large enough to see with a microscope?
No, individual carbon particles are much smaller than the resolution limit of a light microscope, which is around 200 nanometers. A scanning electron microscope or a transmission electron microscope would be needed to visualize individual carbon particles, which are typically on the nanoscale.
What experiment looking at structures smaller than a cell would most likely employ?
transmission electron microscope
What size particles are most dangerous to breath?
First of all this a bioscience question and not a particle physics question. Particle physics deals with the study of the properties of various subatomic particles. These particles cannot be seen by your eyes or a microscope. You would need a electron microscope or a more powerful instrument to see and study a particular particle. So please ask your question in the biology category.
Would oxygen particles enter a cell through diffusion more likely than fat particles?
Yes, oxygen particles would enter a cell through diffusion more readily than fat particles due to their smaller size and higher solubility in the cell membrane. Fat particles are larger and less likely to pass through the cell membrane via simple diffusion.
Which tool is most likely to produce a clear image of very tiny structures inside a cell?
High powered, high resolution microscopes.
What kind of microscope do you need to see particles?
To see particles, such as individual cells or microorganisms, you would typically need a light microscope. However, to see smaller particles like viruses or nanoparticles, you would need an electron microscope.
Which microscope would most likely show the most detail?
scanning electron microscope
Which labeled part of the microscope would most likely be adjusted?
The fine focus knob is the labeled part of the microscope that would most likely be adjusted to bring the specimen into sharp focus.
Are particles of carbon almost large enough to see with a microscope?
No, individual carbon particles are much smaller than the resolution limit of a light microscope, which is around 200 nanometers. A scanning electron microscope or a transmission electron microscope would be needed to visualize individual carbon particles, which are typically on the nanoscale.
Why a microscope is necessary in order to observe brownian motion?
A microscope is necessary to observe Brownian motion because the movement of particles is very small and needs to be magnified in order to be visible to the human eye. The microscope allows us to see the random motion of the particles as they collide with each other and move in a liquid or gas. Without a microscope, the individual particle movements would be too small to detect.
A microscope that uses electrons to examine a specimen is called a what?
A microscope that uses electrons to examine a specimen is called a transmission electron microscope (TEM). It has a higher magnification and resolution compared to light microscopes, allowing for detailed viewing of subcellular structures and particles.
If a scientist wanted to count how many bacterial cells were in a drop of a liquid sample which type of microscope would she most likely use?
Modern light microscope
What three jobs would you not want to do if your health is important to you?
virologist, swage technicion, e.r doctor
What soil particles would likely cause the formation of micro-pores?
There is no item on the list of choices that you posted with your question that would be likely to do that.
What is an expert on Influenza called?
Since influenza is caused by a virus, an expert in that field would be a virologist.
What part of the microscope might an arrow point to on a picture if it shows a cylinder that is the heart of a microscope?
The arrow would likely point to the cylinder lens, which is the objective lens of the microscope. This lens is responsible for magnifying the specimen being observed.
How would a fast-flowing river be most likely to move sand-sized particles of sediment?
The particles would stay on the side of the bank and be known as a runoff.
