No, an electron microscope is needed to see a virus.
No, individual carbon particles are much smaller than the resolution limit of a light microscope, which is around 200 nanometers. A scanning electron microscope or a transmission electron microscope would be needed to visualize individual carbon particles, which are typically on the nanoscale.
transmission electron microscope
First of all this a bioscience question and not a particle physics question. Particle physics deals with the study of the properties of various subatomic particles. These particles cannot be seen by your eyes or a microscope. You would need a electron microscope or a more powerful instrument to see and study a particular particle. So please ask your question in the biology category.
Yes, oxygen particles would enter a cell through diffusion more readily than fat particles due to their smaller size and higher solubility in the cell membrane. Fat particles are larger and less likely to pass through the cell membrane via simple diffusion.
High powered, high resolution microscopes.
To see particles, such as individual cells or microorganisms, you would typically need a light microscope. However, to see smaller particles like viruses or nanoparticles, you would need an electron microscope.
scanning electron microscope
The fine focus knob is the labeled part of the microscope that would most likely be adjusted to bring the specimen into sharp focus.
No, individual carbon particles are much smaller than the resolution limit of a light microscope, which is around 200 nanometers. A scanning electron microscope or a transmission electron microscope would be needed to visualize individual carbon particles, which are typically on the nanoscale.
A microscope is necessary to observe Brownian motion because the movement of particles is very small and needs to be magnified in order to be visible to the human eye. The microscope allows us to see the random motion of the particles as they collide with each other and move in a liquid or gas. Without a microscope, the individual particle movements would be too small to detect.
A microscope that uses electrons to examine a specimen is called a transmission electron microscope (TEM). It has a higher magnification and resolution compared to light microscopes, allowing for detailed viewing of subcellular structures and particles.
Modern light microscope
virologist, swage technicion, e.r doctor
There is no item on the list of choices that you posted with your question that would be likely to do that.
Since influenza is caused by a virus, an expert in that field would be a virologist.
The arrow would likely point to the cylinder lens, which is the objective lens of the microscope. This lens is responsible for magnifying the specimen being observed.
The particles would stay on the side of the bank and be known as a runoff.