Yes because its a FREE state
According to the fugitive slave laws a slave was not automatically free if he/she escaped to a slave free state. If a slave was caught in a free state, the people were obligated to hold them for the slave chasers. Not many people obeyed this rule, though.
No a slave catcher could come and take them back but in Canada they were free
Not necessarily. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 required free states to aid in the capture and return of escaped slaves. This meant that even if a slave reached a free state, they were at risk of being apprehended and returned to their owner.
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 required that escaped slaves be returned to their masters even if they were in a free state. It mandated that law enforcement officials in free states assist in capturing and returning escaped slaves.
to the free states or canada
Missouri would be admitted to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The Compromise ruled that any territory north of 36 30 latitude would be free and below it would be slave.
The Compromise of 1850 was the plan under which California entered the Union. In exchange for allowing another free state into the United States, the Fugitive Slave Act was passed, which ordered northern states to return escaped slaves to their masters in the south.
it was a free state >3
A slave state. Its Southern border was taken as the line, North of which slavery would henceforth be illegal.
Basically, if a slave escaped from their masters to a free state or even Canada, their former master could eventually find and capture them. There was no limit on how long this was possible for.
It was because they had an even number of slave and free states. If Missouri came in as a slave state then it would make it uneven and it would upset the balance.