It depends on the slaver owner, almost all slave owners supported slavery, but a few opposed it and were simply trapped in a system that necessitated them owning slaves.
owner of a large bank
The abolition of slavery would impact the helpers by granting them freedom and possibly better living conditions. The plantation owner would need to adjust their business model to employ paid labor instead of relying on slaves. This could impact their profitability and require them to rethink their operations.
Either owner can withdraw all the funds. Half the funds would be available to a creditor of either owner for such reasons as a child support lien or tax lien. When one owner dies the account would not need to go through probate- it would pass automatically to the survivor.
There is no evidence to suggest that Justice James Iredell owned slaves. He was known to be opposed to slavery and advocated for its gradual abolition.
most likely federalist party because they fall into manufacturing and bussiness.
Edmund Randolph was a slave owner and a supporter of slavery. He did not advocate for the abolition of slavery and did not take a public stand against the practice during his lifetime.
If the company is not incorporated then yes, the assets of the company technically belong directly to the owner and can be garnished to pay child support. To avoid this, the company can become incorporated and the owner should be given a specific salary set by the corporation.
That would be up to the owner of the property whether they would accept you as a co-signer.That would be up to the owner of the property whether they would accept you as a co-signer.That would be up to the owner of the property whether they would accept you as a co-signer.That would be up to the owner of the property whether they would accept you as a co-signer.
a brand owner is the owner of the brand so if i owned next shop then i would be the brand owner
An owner of a large Canadian motorboat factory might support free trade, as it could open up new markets for their products and reduce costs associated with tariffs and trade barriers. Access to international markets can lead to increased sales and potentially higher profits. However, they may also be concerned about foreign competition and the impact it could have on their business. Ultimately, their support for free trade would depend on balancing these factors.
An owner of a large Canadian motorboat factory might support free trade if it allows for easier access to international markets, potentially increasing sales and profits. However, they might also be concerned about foreign competition, which could impact domestic pricing and market share. Ultimately, their stance would depend on the specific trade agreements and how they affect their business operations.
a brand owner is the owner of the brand so if i owned next shop then i would be the brand owner