It could be because it make the clone age much faster. New reacearch could solve this.
Replacement cloning is a theoretical possibility, and would be a combination of therapeutic and reproductive cloning. Replacement cloning would entail the replacement of an extensively damaged, failed, or failing body through cloning followed by whole or partial brain transplant.
The impact of cloning organisms in America is unknown and there is no way to predict what kind of advantages and/or disadvantages there would be as a result of cloning.
Some potential benefits of cloning humans, animals, plants, etc. would be cloning needed body parts for sick people, cloning important people, cloning missed, loved ones, etc.
Cloning, to me, is making a total duplicate of someone's body. But with no spirit put there by God, then it would be without a mind, will or emotion.
It would be perfectly acceptable to say highly risky activities, however, the most common phrasing would be high risk activities.
I do not believe that anyone in the world has their own cloning cabbage, so the question makes no sense!
I believe cloning should be done, it would help the world a lot more. Also I wouldnt have to do as much for myself, because I would have a clone!
cloning must be prohibited ,because it is against god powers and also is harmful to human nature
Nothing. Or maybe the large controversy over cloning.
It would depend on what the Venn diagram was about.
No, Cloning is an expensive means of reproduction. It would be much cheaper and easier to breed cannon fodder by the old fashion means.
A good Christians view on cloning is no. No cloning.