Developing your own photos will not save your time and money on the contrary you will spend more, and will produce worse results. You can not match the output quality of modern computerized, fully automated developing machines. One can do it as hobby and may be for giving special effects but not for saving money
Having your own darkroom will save you money if you are taking, developing, resizing, and redistibuting a lot of pictures on a daily basis. The average picture taker would not save money with a dark room, especially if you own a digital camera already.
Like you would do in saving photos. File >>Save>>go to My Documents and click save.
You just save them on your computer.
Besides an SD card, you can either save your photos on your computer . Also , you can save your photos online . You could save your photos on Photobucket which also lets you organize them .
of the money they found they would save. I THINK
The price difference between the initial cost of a video camera and the cost of developing still photos and film is difficult to gauge because it all depends on quantity. If you develop a large amount of film than the video camera will eventually pay for itself.
yes because it wouldn't use electricity so you would save money on your electric bill
If you are referring to texted photos, hold your finger in the photo and until you can save to SD card. Should not be in your gallery.
you save all the money that you would of spent on crappy fertilizer and just use your own waste
You can't.
it would probaly save alot of money bcause it is used to produce water energy and electricity.that is a two for one special.
Solar panels can save money, if you buy the panels for $15,000 the yearly savings would be about $600.00 and you would recoup your investment in 17 years.