Devastated itself is not a suffix. The -ed in devastated is a suffix however.
No, "devistated" is not a suffix. A suffix is a letter or group of letters added to the end of a word to change its meaning. "Devastated" is an adjective describing extreme sadness or destruction.
The suffix to "unwritten" would be "-en."
A suffix for white could be "-ness" or "-ish." An example word with the suffix "-ness" would be "whiteness," and an example word with the suffix "-ish" would be "whitish."
The suffix for lazy would be "-ness".
To add a suffix to "habitat," you would simply attach the suffix to the end of the word. For example, adding the suffix "-ion" would create the word "habitation."
unthink
Yes, it is spelt correctly in the question.
the suffix for diary would be "diaries"
the suffix would be "ness"
Yes, "eloquent" does have a suffix. The suffix in "eloquent" is "-ent," which is used to form adjectives indicating a state or condition.
the prefix would be -an and the suffix would be -aemia
The suffix for develop would be -op
no, 's' would not be a suffix.
The suffix would be thorax. The chest
he was devistated but content
the suffix of contradict would probably be con.
The suffix for act of acting would be 'ion' making 'action.'
Virtue does not have a suffix. If it did, it would probably be tue, but this is not recognizable as a suffix.