One thing would be it's natural abundance of diamonds.
Australia has many natural resources. These resources include mineral resources, such as copper, gold and diamonds, energy resources, such as coal, oil, and uranium, and land resources that are used for farming and logging. These resources are economically important to Australia. Many people believe that Australia's economy is resource dependent, which means that if these resources were to be depleted, Australia's economy would suffer.
I would not think there is any difference and that is an opinion.... looking at the facts i would say natural diamonds and they are both real....... but ... my opinion is that natural is better.Another Answer'Better' is relative.You will pay more and make more at the time of sale for a natural diamond than you will from a created diamond. So if your 'better' means 'more valuable', then natural diamonds are 'better'.
An advantage of Natural Resources would be the option for renewable resources.
You can dig for diamonds in Arkansas' state park: Crater of Diamonds, and keep any diamond that you find. There may be an admission fee to the state park, and you would be required to either rent or purchase that tools you choose to use there.
some natural resources in the Florida keys would be:orangestreescropscoralseagrass
i would say about 50% of Tennessee is natural resources.
An advantage of Natural Resources would be the option for renewable resources.
Natural resources: Petroleum and natural gas, hydroelectric power, metals and minerals, fish, forests, wildlife, abundant fresh water.
some natural resources would be: gold, and something else
If the U.S. had been poor in Natural Resources, how would industrialization have been affected
Common natural resources are resources that are found almost everywhere and are made pretty quickly, these would include trees, water, and wind. Endangered natural resources would be any resource that is almost gone, which would consist of oil, coal, and almost every fossil fuel.