No.
Polar compounds are dissolved better in water.
Not much, really. A trip to Mars would most likely be lauched when it and Earth are relatively close to each other. At that point, the two planets are separated by about 4 million miles of empty space. You'd be lucky if you encountered more than dust particles.
No! That would kill the plant. Water is essential for the plant to live.
If you would be melting ice, and you collected all the water dripping off the melting icecube and put it into an icecube maker, and stuck it in the freezer, you would be reversing the chemical change. I think?
you would get tastier, better food. plants would die
Water rockets use water and air modern rockets use thrust and oxygen.
Water rockets need fins because the rocket needs to stay in balance....without fins on a water rocket, the water rocket would be going out of control because it is not in balance!
Yes, the NASA website even has tutorials for how to build water rockets with body tubes.
No they cannot. Why do you think that they're called 'dirt rockets'
Less water more air
A seed would grow better in water i did a science project on it.
air and water
they need water.
Newton's third law
It would grow better in water than soil because it would obsorbe the exact amount of water it needs.
Umm water or water? I would say water.
No, gas would be better. Gas can be used in many productive machines. The efficiency ratio of Work to pollution is better for gas than water.