The names are in the public domain, as the original work is from 1900. However, images from the 1939 film are still protected.
If it is recognizable as a copyright or trademark-protected character, you would need permission from the owner.
Probably the actual movies special features on the disk, it would be very difficult to find online due to copyright infringement.
Both are forms of unlicensed copying, but it's possible to have one without the other. An example of copyright infringement without plagiarism would be uploading a track from an album you bought: you're not saying it's yours, but you're still copying it without permission. Plagiarism without copyright infringement would happen when you take materials in the public domain and try to pass them off as your own. Romeo and Juliet? I totally wrote that.
It depends upon the copyright laws by which the beloved 1939 film version of 'The Wizard of Oz' is governed. According to the old copyright laws, the copyright could be extended twice, at 28 years each. In this case, the copyright would have run out in 1995. According to the new copyright laws, the film could be protected by copyright for 75 years. If that's the selected copyright provision, then the film is protected until 2014.
This is copyright infringement if you do not get permission to use the footage. The question of whether or not you would get caught is debatable, but it is illegal to use the footage without permission.
No it would not be a copyright infringement. Copyright does not protect names, titles, common words/phrases, facts, ideas, systems, or methods of operation. However product names can be, and usually rare, registered as trademarks.
Copying, altering, distributing, or performing/displaying the file without permission from the copyright holder or an exemption in the law would be considered infringement.
That would be copyright infringement if the original song was protected.
No. That would be CopyRight Infringement
Innocent infringement is a violation of copyright without willful intent. Accidentally moving an mp3 onto a shared drive would be innocent infringement.
You would be guilty of copyright infringement, a federal crime.
The story of the Wonderful Wizard of Oz is in the public domain; you just want to avoid looking too much like the movie, which is still protected.
No; the story of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz is in the public domain. Using images directly from the film, however, would be infringing.
I wouldn't think that would qualify as copyright infringement because aren't his poems under public domain?
The picture itself is protected by copyright; downloading it without permission would be copyright infringement.
Using a logo without permission would be trademarkinfringement.
No. But, in all likelihood it would be a violation of trademark