False
If a mitochondria is destroyed, the cell would no longer be able to produce energy in the form of ATP through aerobic respiration. This could lead to cell death or dysfunction, affecting the overall function of tissues and organs in the body.
I would say "That is a true statement!"
I would say potential and kinetic true true
True. Light energy is electromagnetic radiation that is invisible to the naked eye.
There are many different laws of conservation, but they are essentially the same. For this example I will use energy. The laws of conservation of energy say that energy in = energy out. This is to say that energy cannot be destroyed or created.
When scientists say energy can never be destroyed, they are referring to the law of conservation of energy, which states that energy can only be transferred or transformed from one form to another, but it cannot be created or destroyed. This principle is a fundamental concept in physics and helps explain the behavior of energy in various systems.
No.
People say it in the sense of that we use it flawlessly and carelessly. We are not doing any good activities at all.
Energy isn't "destroyed" and mass isn't "created" Basically mass is a "form" of energy. Much like ice is a "form" of water. So while one could, kinda, say "ice is destroyed when it melts into water" it isn't exactly true (even though it is no longer ice).
The law of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or transformed. This means that the total energy of a system remains constant. So, at the top and bottom of a system, the total energy would be the same, with potential energy at the top transforming into kinetic energy at the bottom.
To say the words very true in Korean you would say maeu sasil.
destroyed = zerstört destroyed = verwüstet