answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There are already millions of unionized workers in right to work states.

What there is NOT is mandatory dues paying. Workers individually decide how much to pay unions for the services they provide.

Since individual workers generally pay unions less than the union wants in "full dues", unions in RTW states have less political clout (that is , MONEY) than unions in states where workers must pay whatever dues the union demands or lose their jobs.

RTW states are economically stronger than mandatory membership / mandatory dues states.

Voters do not favor reducing a state's economic strength.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Would most voters like to abolish right to work state status and institute unions?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Should the US congress abolish the county government system?

No. This is local government and they are not given that power. The county government system is controlled by local voters.


The use of poll taxes as a method to disenfranchise voters was based on what factor?

Economic Status


What percent of voters are needed to recall an elected official?

The percent of voters needed to recall an elected official varies depending on the specific laws and regulations in each jurisdiction. In general, it typically requires a certain percentage of registered voters to sign a petition in favor of the recall, which can range from around 10% to 25% in different places.


Has a ballot measure concerning same-sex marriage been put before voters in Ohio?

Yes. In 2004, 62% of Ohio voters ratified an amendment to the state constitution banning same-sex marriage and civil unions.


Has a ballot measure concerning same-sex marriage been put before voters in Georgia?

Yes. In 2004, 76% of voters in the US state of Georgia ratified an amendment to the state constitution banning same-sex marriage and civil unions.


Has a ballot measure concerning same-sex marriage been put before voters in Kentucky?

Yes. In November 2004, 75% of Kentucky voters ratified an amendment to the state constitution banning same-sex marriage and civil unions in that state.


Has a ballot measure concerning same-sex marriage been put before voters in North Dakota?

Yes. In November 2004, 73% of North Dakota voters ratified an amendment to the state constitution banning same-sex marriage and civil unions.


What percent of Illinois residents oppose same-sex marriage?

According to a September 2012 Paul Simon Public Policy Institute poll, 43.6% of Illinois residents support same-sex marriage, 31.8% support civil unions and 20.2% oppose any legal recognition of same-sex relationships. Previously, an October 2010 poll by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University Carbondale found that 26.5 percent of Illinois voters opposed all legal recognition of same-sex relationships. 33.6 percent favor same-sex marriage and 33.9 percent favored civil unions.


Has a ballot measure concerning same-sex marriage been put before voters in Alabama?

Yes, in June 2006. 81% of voters approved a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and civil unions. That ban has since been struck down as unconstitutional.


Does Texas have a law or constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage?

Yes. In 2005, Texas' "Proposition 2" was passed with 76.25% of voters in favor. It provided that marriage was strictly between one man and one woman, and prevented the creation of any similar status or identity (e.g, civil unions). There has been some legal contention on the matter but the ban remains in effect.


Has a ballot measure concerning same-sex marriage been put before voters in Florida?

Yes. On November 6, 2008, 62% of Florida voters ratified an amendment to the state constitution banning same-sex marriage and civil unions. That amendment has since been struck down as unconstitutional.


Has a ballot measure concerning same-sex marriage been put before voters in Kansas?

Yes. In 2005, 70% of Kansas voters ratified an amendment to the state constitution banning same-sex marriage and civil unions in Kansas. That amendment was struck down as unconstitutional on November 4, 2014.