0
Yes, peoples lives would be worse without any animals because, the world we live in today is ran by the cycle of life everything plays a big part in our universe from the honeybees to the mighty lions. Food would be in a less abundance, people would not be as strong would lack vitamins and protein only found in poultry. before man had access to plows and cars and other sources we use in todays society animals were use for traveling harvesting and other criteria.
What else can I help you with?
What animal that lives in another plant or animal an eats that plant or animals without killing it?
This would be a parasite.
How did Fred Hollows discovery affect peoples lives?
animals that eat grass is call herbivore
How would lung cancer effect peoples lives?
very badly..............
What is an animals that lives in another plant or animal and eats that plant or animals without killing it?
A parasite
How does the environment affect peoples lives?
we eat other organisms such as plant and animals. We destroy forests, and build parking lots.
What animal lives in another plant or animals without killing it?
a termight
What are the effects of floods on peoples lives and the environment?
It distroys peoples lives, familys and friends.
How does a dolphin save peoples lives?
it saves peoples lives by keeping tham from drowning
How did 9-11 change peoples lives?
how did 9/11 change peoples lives
How did clerenc thomas chang peoples lives?
how did clearance Thomas change peoples lives
How do scientists use their research to improve peoples lives?
one example would be medicine
what is the correct use of the apostrophe in people's lives or peoples' lives?
The correct use of the apostrophe in "people's lives" indicates possession, meaning the lives belonging to people. "Peoples' lives" would imply the lives of multiple distinct groups (or nations) of people, which is less common. Therefore, "people's lives" is typically the appropriate choice in most contexts.
