There would have to be an unbalanced force put an object in motion but once in motion no force is necessary for it to remain in motion
An object in equilibrium is not moving, as all the forces acting on the object are balanced. If the object were to be in motion, it would no longer be in equilibrium as there would be an unbalanced force acting on it.
In principle, any force acting on an object is unbalanced, UNLESS there is a second force in the opposite direction, acting on the same object.
An unbalanced force acting on an object is a force that causes the object to accelerate or change its direction. When the net force acting on an object is not zero, it will result in the object experiencing motion. This can lead to the object speeding up, slowing down, or changing its path of motion.
A balanced force will not cause a moving object to change its constant speed. It's an unbalanced force that would either speed up or slow down the moving object.
Unbalanced forces cause acceleration, not movement. An object can move at a constant speed with no net force acting on it. An example would be an object falling at terminal velocity.It would have to have been already moving. Newton's First law states that an object at rest will remain at rest and an object in motion will remain in motion with the same speed and direction unless it is acted upon by an unbalanced force. The second part of the law explains this.
-- An unbalanced group of forces on an object causes the object to accelerate in the direction of the net force. -- If an object is not moving, then the group of forces on it must be balanced, else it would be accelerated.
Yes, due to momentum. For example, an object traveling in space might have no forces acting on it but still be moving through space. However, the question might also be asked, how did this object start moving in the first place? If the object was created in a stationary state, then unbalanced forces would have to act upon it to get it moving. The object would have to have been created while moving in order to get it to move without unbalanced forces acting upon it.
In a diagram for unbalanced forces, you would typically have two or more arrows representing the forces acting on an object pointing in different directions and with different lengths to indicate the magnitude of the forces. The object will likely be shown moving or accelerating in the direction of the larger force.
An unbalanced force is when one force is stronger than another force acting on an object. This causes the object to move in the direction of the stronger force. For example, pushing a toy car harder on one side can make it turn because of unbalanced forces acting on it.
When an object changes direction, the forces acting on the object are typically unbalanced. This change in direction indicates that there is a net force acting on the object, causing it to accelerate or decelerate in the new direction. Balanced forces would result in a constant velocity without any change in direction.
Assuming this is a vacuum: Motion would occur only if there is no secondly force acting on the object with the same magnitude(strength) but has the opposite direction to the force you're acting upon this object.
Doubling the force acting on a moving object would cause the object to accelerate at a faster rate, leading to an increase in its speed. This is in accordance with Newton's second law of motion, which states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the force acting on it.