No, because the use now would be the use then which is not really vestigial.
Body parts that are reduced in size with no apparent function would be vestigial limbs. Evolution could be at the root of the development of vestigial limbs. A good example would be a T-Rex with his tiny arms.
A vestigial structure is an anatomical feature that has lost most or all of its original function through evolution. An example of something that is not a vestigial structure would be the wings of birds, which are fully functional and essential for flight. In contrast, vestigial structures, like the human appendix, serve little to no purpose in the current species.
The opposite of vestigial organs would be functionalorgans.
Vestigial structures are considered evidence, but no more critical than any other line of evidence in Biology and palaeontology. They're considered evidence, not because of their function, but because of the way their morphologies follow the nested hierarchies of biology: the vestigial legs of whales, for instance, have exactly the kind of shape we would have expected them to have if whales had descended from land mammals. The same goes for human tailbones and embryonic branchial ridges, the wings of emus, and so on.
The opposite of vestigial organs would be functionalorgans.
A structure that has no use in the organism
A penguin's vestigial structure is its wings. Penguins have evolved to be flightless, so their wings are no longer used for flying. Instead, they have adapted to use their wings for swimming in the water.
Bacteria
The part of the brain that would have the least primitive organisms is the neocortex. This region is responsible for higher-order functions such as reasoning, complex thought, and sensory perception, and is highly developed in mammals, particularly humans. In contrast, more primitive organisms primarily rely on simpler brain structures, such as the brainstem and limbic system, which govern basic survival functions and emotions. Therefore, as organisms evolve, they develop more advanced brain regions like the neocortex, leading to increased cognitive abilities.
Vestigial structures are structures that no longer fulfill their original purpose. Take wisdom teeth in humans as an example of this. At one time, as we know from the fossil record, human jaws were larger and could accommodate those wisdom teeth. As jaws became smaller wisdom teeth erupted into too small a mouth more and more times over human evolution until very few mouths can accommodate the onset of these teeth and they now are generally pulled at eruption. So, we can see the history of human evolution in our teeth!
If you mean Do organisms move to environments that meet their needs. then yes, if they can. Otherwise they do poorly or die. if the organisms have enough time they will evolve to use the new environment.If the question is "Do organisms impact their environment to be better suited to themselves", then no, they do not. The environment shapes the organism, not the other way around.
possibly not, because we rely on certain organisms that rely on the sun to survive. We would need to evolve.