No. The maximum magnification of compound optical microscope is approx 1000. This would allow a person to see an object approximately 0.1 micrometres (10^-7 metres) in size. The radius of an atom is less than 1/400 of that.
It isn't a element, as an element is one atom. It would be a compound if the elements chemically combined, but if they didn't, its a misture
An atom is smaller than a compound because if an electron fits in an atom, and an atom is a part of a compound, it means a compound is bigger than an atom
Pio
It would be a compound if it existed, but such a compound is impossible.
A compound can contain a single atom of gold, but a single atom of gold alone, by itself, cannot be a compound.
When a fluorine atom and a potassium atom come into contact, a reaction would likely occur where the fluorine atom will try to gain an electron from the potassium atom to achieve stability. This reaction would result in the formation of potassium fluoride, a compound consisting of one potassium ion and one fluorine ion.
When naming the compound containing calcium and chlorine, the suffix of the atom name changes to "-ide." Therefore, the compound would be named calcium chloride.
Atomic Force Microscope, or one of its variants.
The compound would have the chemical formula SO3.
A scientist would use a high-powered electron microscope to see an atom. This microscope uses electrons instead of light to visualize objects at the atomic scale. Due to the smaller wavelength of electrons compared to light, the electron microscope can achieve much higher resolution, allowing scientists to observe atomic structures.
The atomic force microscope is an instrument.
Not unless your highschool has an electron microscope