Emily Bronte's 'Wuthering Heights' is a classic work of literature for several reasons. because it possesses themes that have withstood the test of time. It includes universal emotions that will always be relevant. The novel vividly represents a long gone era, is populated with flawed characters, and contains everlasting themes we can relate to today.
Wuthering Heights is a classic novel for children ages 8-12. Other than this age group, the novel has no literary value whatsoever to adults above the age of 12 and children younger than 8. I think someone is playing a trick on you. Wuthering heights is a classic peice of English literature, and considered (for some strange reason) to be one of the greatest love stories ever told. The first answer here is ridiculous a child 8-12 would have to be exceptionally gifted if they were able to read and understand the language used in Wuthering Heights. Many adults would not. It is a classic piece of literature and as a love story I have read no other like it.
Nothing of itself, it is not capable of understanding, it is just a means to the heights of reason.
The answer depends on what you consider to be the limitations.
Well, that really depends on your definition of classic. There were classics already when Shakespeare was writing, and he wasn't counted as part of them because his work was, then, contemporary and unproven. In the modern day, his work is certainly considered classic by many. Those who do not consider his work to be classic may be of the somewhat snobbish school of literature which considers only the incomprehensible, the multi-cultural, or the disenfranchised to be worthy. And certainly they may be worthy, but in that school neither Shakespeare nor Science Fiction will ever get a fair hearing.
the traditional age given as the "age of reason" is 7
The opposite action of to reason (to consider) is to react.
Its called "holy" for a reason...
a great pet but a little hard, but the classic reason is because of nemo
Loyalists :)
Loyalists.
There is no reason because the statement for which you are seeking a reason is patently FALSE. Consider a pentagram, for example.
Nobody was "given" the Golan Heights in 1981. Israel conquered the Golan Heights from Syria in 1967 and repelled a Syrian invasion to retake the Golan Heights in 1973. By the end of the Arab-Israeli population of 1973, the Arab population of the Golan Heights and its strategic value was immense. Therefore, in 1981, Prime Minister Menachem Begin decided to annex the territory of the Golan Heights to the Israel. This has been seen by most international observers as a violation of UNSC Resolution 242 and 338 which requires that Israel return the Golan Heights to Syria in exchange for peace, not to acquire it. Israel has responded by saying that it fully intends to return the territory to Syria should a peace treaty be struck, but it sees no reason why it has to leave the Golan Heights under military administration pending such a resolution as opposed to a civilian one.