Yes.
It would depend on the severity and location of the avalanche
You would not get any diseases, you would be buried. Avalanches of snow would sweep you under many feet of snow, suffocating you. You would not need diseases to die in this situation.
Nobody would go and climb an avalanche on Mount Everest or any mountain. A climber would, if they could, run for cover because any avalanche is likely to kill him or her.
He gets killed by an avalanche.
When it gets run down by a avalanche and when it runs out of fries and burgers
No because then the map would change and certain things would be blocked off and could possibly kill the enemies.
If one hit they would be unprepared.
The worst avalanche ever recorded in the United States based on death rates would be the avalanche in Wellington, Washington State, in the winter of 1910.
An avalanche is a mixture of loose sand, rock, and water (usually in the form of snow) moving at a rapid pace.
Not very well at all, I would think. Avalanches contain huge amounts of power, and a moderately powerful avalanche would topple ordinary stone walls in a fraction of a second. You would need something really massive to stop an avalanche, and then you would need to ask why you want it there in the first place.
A landslide is something that would occur in a dry climate ( a cliff side, dirt) and a avalanche occurs in the snow.
I would say is Kirby's Avalanche