No, not unless there was a large disturbance that rearranged the layers.
faunal succession is basically stating that the more complex something is, the younger it is. So the bigger the fossil is the younger it is.
Aragonite only occurs in fossils of the Cainozoic era as the unstable polymorph aragonite rearranges its chemical structure to form more stable Calcite over time.
Relatively, they are younger than the rock they cut through.
relative dating
You might start with this link which is aimed at younger people: http://tiki.oneworld.net/genetics/
From the law of faunal succession,older beds are characterized by fossils of older age and the younger beds are characterized by younger age fossils.But in some exceptional condition the younger fossils are reported in the older formation and those are termed as leaked fossils. whereas,Fossils of older age occur in younger rock are known as reworked fossils.They are derived from the older rocks by reworking ad recycling of sediments.
this is an incoherent question that cannot possibly be answered
It can only be used for younger fossils and such because carbon-14 has a relatively short half-life of around 2400 years.
If the rocks containing the fossils have been involved in a mountain building episode they would be folded and if some of the folds were laid in a recumbent position and later eroded you would have older above younger rocks. Of course, it would be easy to find out if this was the case because of the various sedimentary structures in each separate layer of rock.
faunal succession is basically stating that the more complex something is, the younger it is. So the bigger the fossil is the younger it is.
The fossils found at the top of a canyon will probably be younger than those at the of the bottom of the canyon because the fossils at the bottom of the canyon would have been there earlier when the so called "canyon" was once a flat land, so as time went by, the flat land began growing and getting taller and finally became a canyon so the fossils at the top of the canyon WOULD be younger than those at the bottom because the bottom fossils were there before the top of the canton even existed.
pampered
Fossils!Fossils are the 'remains' of plants and animals (including humans) which lived in the past. Millions of fossils have been found all over the world. They show clearly that different species of plants and animals lived in the past and that they changed over long periods of time. Older fossils are simpler than younger fossils and we can work out the sequence of evolution from these fossils.For example the oldest vertebrate (backboned) fossils are fish. Younger than these are the first amphibians. Then reptiles appear as fossils, followed by birds and mammals.See:http://animals.about.com/od/evolution/a/vertebrateevolu.htmhttp://txtwriter.com/Backgrounders/Evolution/EVpage01.htmlhttp://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/lines/Ifossil_ev.shtmlhttp://www.fossilmuseum.net/
It would be found in the lower layers, rather that younger fossils which are found in the upper layers. ♥
The youngest rocks would be igneous, those created by cooling magma. Impossible to find a fossil there.
Aragonite only occurs in fossils of the Cainozoic era as the unstable polymorph aragonite rearranges its chemical structure to form more stable Calcite over time.
1. cradle snatcher A person who prefers relatively younger sexual partners or courtship partners. Someone who dates a person considerably younger than themselves.