I, user J0shu493, personally would rather live by Rush Limbaugh's morals.
The same thing that motivated the Franks themselves: A desire to save their own lives. This struck me as a rather unnecessary question to ask.
Ethical is an adjective that describes actions commited in the name of morals. Ethics are forever changing since it is philosophic rather than factul which means that as the morals of society change so does what is concidered "ethical."
Barney, the purple dinosaur from the children's television show "Barney & Friends," does not have any children. Instead, he serves as a mentor and friend to the children on the show, teaching them important life lessons through songs and play. The focus is on friendship and learning rather than family.
None, he is not part of the executive branch but rather in the legislative branch.
No, the movie was not an accurate portrayal of the events that happened in Gallipoli but rather a portrayal of the values and morals of the soldiers that fought in Gaillipoli.
i read the first sentence then i threw it away its so bad! id rather read barney loves you
Constantine was neither the leader of the Huns nor the Franks; he was a Roman emperor who ruled from 306 to 337 AD. He is best known for being the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity and for founding the city of Constantinople. The Huns were led by Attila, while the Franks were ruled by leaders such as Clovis. Constantine's influence was primarily within the Roman Empire rather than among these barbarian groups.
The parables are stories Jesus told to the people about how they should act and rather than just telling them he let the people work out the morals for themselves.
The lawyer on "Barney Miller" was played by Hal Linden, who portrayed Captain Barney Miller himself. The character of the lawyer, who often appeared in various storylines, was primarily represented by the character of "Officer Arthur P. Luger," played by James Gregory. However, the main focus of the show was on the comedic dynamics within the police precinct rather than a specific lawyer character.
The Franks were successful because they were skilled warriors who adapted to Roman military tactics, had strong leadership, and formed alliances with other groups. They also effectively incorporated Roman political and administrative structures into their own society, allowing them to establish a powerful kingdom in the post-Roman era.
The Franks used corporal punishments like flogging, amputation, and branding, which are not used in Canada today. These differences can be attributed to evolving societal norms, legal systems, and human rights standards. Canada's legal framework emphasizes rehabilitation and restorative justice rather than retribution.
Some might quibble, but my understanding is that the Franks are/were a Germanic tribe. It is also my understanding, that they appeared later than the Germanic tribes the Romans first encountered in their conquest of northern/western Europe. Somewhere in the process they started speaking a Latin based language rather than a Germanic based tongue.