Yes, but "eye" do it anyways. (Badum, crash)
Reading under a dim light can hurt your eye and cause you to strain to see (like I am right now) so you better not do it!
FACT: THERE IS A GARFIELD STRIP ABOUT THIS! I SUGGEST YOU READ IT!
No, it most certainly will not. It strains your eyes whenever you read under a dim light or stand too close to the tv when your watching it. Since you dont always read under a dim light, it strains your eyes and makes them weaker instead of stronger, contrary to popular belief...
sight and smell , taste :)
light that is not under water
A banana under a red light would simply be a banana illuminated by the red light. The color of the light would not change the nature of the banana itself.
It would be black becasue the object would absorb all the red light, and there would be no green light for it to reflect
A red rose would appear darker and less vibrant under blue light due to the interaction between the blue light and the red pigments in the rose petals. The blue light would not enhance the red color of the rose, making it appear different from how it looks under white light.
it would appear black because no red light strikes it
There can be a lot less light under water. The fishes' big eyes gather more light, allowing them to see under water better than small-eyed creatures. the better sight lets them find food much more efficiently.
The yellow cloth would appear dark under cyan light, as cyan light absorbs yellow. It would appear brownish-gray under blue light, as blue light is the opposite of yellow on the color wheel and would cancel it out.
No. That would come under comprehensive insurance.
Green objects under a green light would appear brighter and more vibrant as the green light would enhance the color by adding more green wavelengths to what is already there. The objects would likely blend in with the background if the light is the same shade of green.
It would be a Mr. mime hp30 poke body: no damage effect unless under 30 damage or MEWTWO.