It forced the colonists to supply food and board to the british soldiers
Some British colonists were upset, because they were imposed a tax without their voice in the British Parliament.
He wanted to show the British that the colonists could be fair and treat others fairly. They at least had to try to be kind, fair, and willing with the British.
They thought it was fair to tax the colonists.
They thought it wasn't fair.
it is unfair because the colonists couldn't speak up for themselves because they were scared that if they did the British solders would try to harm them
Two issues that concern American citizens today, which also concerned American colonists long ago, are taxation and representation and individual rights. American colonists protested against taxation without representation and fought for their individual rights, which influenced the foundations of the American Revolution. Today, these issues continue to be a concern among American citizens, with debates over fair taxation systems and the protection of individual rights.
The colonists did not want taxes imposed by the british parliament.
Their language was unfair because they(the American Indians) didn't understand what they were signing. Also, after the treaty of Paris, the American Indians thought that they would let them keep their lands, but the British colonists still took their lands even though they helped the Treaty of Paris
because, the French and Indian war was over and it cost a lot of money. King George the third thought that it wasn't fair that he had to pay everything when he and his army was protecting the colonists. He thought that it would be fair that the colonists pay him for things that came from Britain.
It depends on from which side you look at it from. The Colonists felt that it was unfair because up until that time period they hadn't been taxed by England, due to salutary neglect. However, the Colonists did cause the French-Indian War. This war costed England a lot of money. The only way to pay for the war was to tax the nation's subjects. England had every right to tax the Colonies. Furthermore, citizens living in England itself were paying higher taxes for a war the Colonies started. So the Stamp Act was reasonable and fair, but the Colonists did not feel that way. Any tax is "fair" if it passed by representatives elected by the people who will be taxed. The colonists were justified in claiming the tax was unfair since they were subjected to "taxation without representation." DIFFERENT SIDE OF THE DEBATE: Ant tax is "fair" if the tax is enacted by representatives elected by the people who will be taxed. The colonists were justified in claiming the tax was not fair since they were subjected to "taxation without representation".
It was fair to the British because the have to pay for the French and Indian war. But taxing the colonies was not a fair way of getting that money, because the colonists had no one in England lobbying for their interests.
Because because of the Sugar Act, the colonists felt that taxation without representation wasn't fair. Does that help you with the question? Don't forget to give feedback:-)