nope not wrong but that's not conclusive test.u need to repeat it after 3 months.it's said that's the due test be after 6 weeks 99.98% right.but 00.02% is still a risk.so u need to do it again after 3 months then again after 6 months.wish u a good luck bro and use condoms the next time
badboy5994,
yes it could be wrong . this guy up above doesn't know what he is talking about i took an HIV test just to make i didnt have it and it came up positive, so i go in for another test, took it and it was negative. then just to make sure i took one more and it was negative. so yes HIV tests can be wrong.
No
Yes, it is possible to have HPV on a cervical cancer screening even if previous results were negative. the virus may have been detectable at one time and not at another, or you could have picked up a new infection.
If you are pregnant, the urinary tract infection should not have any bearing on the result of your test. The test looks for hCG in the urine, and this is present if you are pregnant regardless of any infection.
No. To try that is certain to result in a lot of pain, strong chance of injury and infection. No.
If you were tested before 3 weeks after infection, the test could have turned up false.
The test for chlamydia remains reliable even if someone has been infected for years. Unlike syphilis, long term infection doesn't give a false negative result. However, a certain percentage of people appear to clear chlamydia infection on their own, so it's possible to have chlamydia in the past but test negative now even without taking treatment.
A false chlamydia test result can come from any of these factors:Urination less than a few hours before urine testing.Poor technique for swabsNot disclosing the possible location of infection (e.g. if you only have receptive anal sex, then urethral testing won't find your infection).Recent antibiotics that reduced, but didn't eliminate, chlamydia infectionTesting too soon after infection.
It is possible however it is not necessarily a result of the Arthritis
Non Reactive - it means that the result is negative and that the sample tested did not show evidence of HIV infection.
It is possible (a false negative test result), but not likely.
They both mean result; but implication is a possible result and outcome of an action, not necessarily negative. whereas consequence is a result of an action, but often not good.
"Evil chance" refers to an unfortunate or negative occurrence that seems to happen by random or accidental circumstances, leading to a negative outcome or consequence. It suggests that the unfortunate event was not deliberate or planned, but happened as a result of bad luck or happenstance.