Given the number of police programs on television today, most people have probably heard of the term "forensics" without really understanding what it means. While it is true law enforcement uses this kind of evidence to help win cases in criminal court, forensic science in general covers a wide area of studies and evidence-gathering. The majority is related to legal work for court cases, but the term can be used in research and related studies or papers as well.
BackgroundForensics evidence essentially follows the theory that the evidence gathered, if preserved as found without manipulation, will point objectively and conclusively to whoever or whatever created it. As a result, such evidence can be extremely valuable in court cases, either criminal or civil. Because much of court presentation is verbal statements and inferences, forensics evidence typically stands out as material juries can wrap their opinions around when making a decision. Lawyers understand this tendency and try to use as much evidence that appears scientific-based as possible.
DefinitionTrue forensics evidence is material that has been gathered or collected and preserved using objective, scientific methods that any scientist in the same situation would follow and get the same results. This nature of how the evidence is obtained is critical. In comparison, litigation science is information or analysis that a legal team has had prepared specifically for a court case and no other purpose. Forensics evidence doesn't always have to be collected for the purposes of trial, but in many criminal cases it is used accordingly.
The Evidence is Only as Good as Its DefenseDespite the scientific background and appearance of forensics evidence when presented, it has weaknesses. The greatest vulnerability has to do with the methodology of collection and preservation. If intentional manipulation can be proven or at least suspected, the evidence loses its strength to an audience. In many instances, again in criminal court, methods of evidence collection have been thrown out even after decades of use with thousands of cases. Additionally, the Supreme Court has held for forensics evidence to be valid in a legal case, the party or lab that has prepared it for presentation has to be available for legal cross-examination. If refused, the evidence can be considered worthless by a court and thrown out. As a result, naming material "forensics evidence" alone does not win a blank check of legal acceptance.
i was just woundering who can submit evidence after a forensic investigation ?
Forensic evidence is not 'sampled,' it is ANALYZED, by taking a 'sample' of it and conducting laboratory or or other technical tests or analyses of it.
Forensic Files - 2000 Army of Evidence was released on: USA: 2005
The final evaluator of forensic evidence is typically the forensic scientist, who analyzes and interprets the evidence to draw conclusions in support of investigations and legal proceedings. Their role is crucial in ensuring that the evidence is accurately interpreted and presented in court.
The specialists used forensic evidence to solve the case
Forensic scientists analyze evidence at a crime scene. A forensic pathologist is different; they are the ones that examine the corpses.
C. G. G. Aitken has written: 'Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists' -- subject(s): Evidence, Expert, Expert Evidence, Forensic sciences, Forensic statistics, Statistical methods
Forensic Files - 2000 Blanket of Evidence was released on: USA: 19 September 2007
Forensics is the study of trace material, often at crime scenes, which are used in courts of law as evidence. Laws also regulate how forensic material is to be gathered and stored, and presented as evidence. Forensic evidence, in turn, is used to provide proof whether a law was broken, and by whom.
Possibly forensic accounting, where research and interpretation of evidence is important
Analysis
A forensic apologist is someone who defends, explains, and supports the use of forensic evidence in legal cases. They analyze and interpret forensic evidence to help attorneys and investigators understand its significance and implications in court proceedings. They may also provide expert testimony to help clarify complex forensic issues for judges and jurors.