answersLogoWhite

0

It's a secondary source.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

A historical document written by an eyewitness or someone who lived through an event A document interpreting eyewitness accounts and other accounts of an event.?

First one is a primary source, because it's from their "Primary View" second one is a secondary source, since they didn't see it in their Primary View, it was told to them. So the answer for apex is (A) primary source; (B) secondary source


Match these two definitions with the words they define definition A a historical document written by an eyewitness or someone who lived through an event definition B a document interpreting eyewitne?

(A) primary source; (B) secondary source


What correctly defines defines primary source and scondary source?

A primary source is a firsthand account or original work created at the time of the event being studied. A secondary source is an interpretation or analysis of primary sources, often produced after the event by someone who did not directly experience it.


What does it mean to be an eyewitness?

An eyewitness is an individual who has observed an event. The event witnessed can be malice, violent, and even life threatening. In addition, an eyewitness's recollection of an event can lead to the detainment of a perpetrator.


Why do eyewitness accounts vary?

Eyewitness accounts vary due to several factors, including individual perception, memory recall, and the influence of stress or trauma during the event. Factors such as lighting, distance, and the presence of distractions can affect how an event is perceived. Additionally, personal biases and subsequent discussions with others can alter a witness's recollection. These elements contribute to the inherent subjectivity of human memory, leading to differing accounts of the same incident.


What is a true statement about eyewitness accounts of a event?

Eyewitness accounts can be highly variable and are often influenced by factors such as stress, attention, and memory biases. Research has shown that people may misremember details or reconstruct events inaccurately based on their perceptions or subsequent information. As a result, while eyewitness testimony can provide valuable insights, it is not always reliable and should be corroborated with other evidence whenever possible.


What is the importance of an eyewitness testimony?

Eyewitness testimony can provide valuable information in legal cases by offering firsthand accounts of events. However, it is also important to consider factors that can affect the accuracy of such testimony, such as memory biases, suggestibility, and stress during the event. corroboration from other evidence is often necessary to support eyewitness testimony.


What does eyewitness account mean?

To see an event.


How do you become a eyewitness to life events?

Find a life event (shouldn't be too hard, as long as you are alive and there are things happening)Watch itCongratulations, you're now an eyewitness to a life event.


What is the primary source of history?

A primary source is an eyewitness account to an event.


Is eyewitness testimony usually accurate?

No, eyewitness testimony can be very inaccurate. When a person sees an event, they filter it through all their experiences, feelings, knowledge, and assumptions. Quite often, what comes out is a very incomplete picture of what happened. Police use eyewitness accounts most effectively when there are many eyewitnesses. They get all the stories and then piece together a more complete picture of an event.


Who was an ancient historian who believed in accurate eyewitness reporting of event?

Herodotus, often referred to as the "Father of History," was an ancient historian who emphasized the importance of accurate eyewitness reporting in his works. He traveled extensively and collected accounts from various sources, aiming to provide a detailed and truthful narrative of historical events, particularly the Greco-Persian Wars. His approach laid the groundwork for future historians in valuing firsthand accounts and critical inquiry.