0
What else can I help you with?
When will a company use the allowance method of accounting for bad debts?
A company will use the allowance method of accounting for bad debts when it needs to match expenses with revenues in the same accounting period, adhering to the matching principle. This method is particularly useful for companies that extend credit to customers, as it allows them to estimate and recognize potential uncollectible accounts in advance, rather than waiting until specific accounts are deemed uncollectible. This approach provides a more accurate representation of a company's financial position and performance.
How does establishing an allowance account satisfy the matching principle?
Establishing an allowance account satisfies the matching principle by recognizing estimated expenses related to uncollectible accounts in the same period as the associated revenue. This approach ensures that expenses are recorded when the related sales occur, aligning the recognition of bad debt expense with the income generated from credit sales. By doing so, financial statements present a more accurate picture of a company's financial performance and position, reflecting the true economic reality of expected losses.
Why is the direct write off method not accepted by GAAP?
There are two reasons why the direct write-off method is not allowed. First, applying the matching principle implies that the cost of the uncollectible accounts need to be expensed in the period of the sale. Giving credit to customers helps to generate sales (if this were not the case, the firm would simply demand payment at time of delivery). Thus, not creating an allowance violates the matching principle. Second, with the direct write-off method, accounts receivable are at the nominal value, whereas the 'true' value (the amount that is expected to be collectible) is most likely lower. Thus, the direct write-off is likely to overstate the value of accounts receivable.
Identify and state two generally accepted accounting principles that relate to adjusting the accounts?
The matching principle and the revenue recogntion principle.
When comparing the direct write-off and allowance methods what applies to the direct write-off method?
The direct write-off method recognizes bad debt expenses only when an account is deemed uncollectible, leading to a potential mismatch between revenues and expenses in the same period. This method does not adhere to the matching principle of accounting, as it can distort financial statements by not estimating uncollectible accounts in advance. Consequently, it is typically used by small businesses or for tax purposes, where simplicity is preferred over accuracy in financial reporting. However, it may not be compliant with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for larger companies.
When will a company use the allowance method of accounting for bad debts?
A company will use the allowance method of accounting for bad debts when it needs to match expenses with revenues in the same accounting period, adhering to the matching principle. This method is particularly useful for companies that extend credit to customers, as it allows them to estimate and recognize potential uncollectible accounts in advance, rather than waiting until specific accounts are deemed uncollectible. This approach provides a more accurate representation of a company's financial position and performance.
How does establishing an allowance account satisfy the matching principle?
Establishing an allowance account satisfies the matching principle by recognizing estimated expenses related to uncollectible accounts in the same period as the associated revenue. This approach ensures that expenses are recorded when the related sales occur, aligning the recognition of bad debt expense with the income generated from credit sales. By doing so, financial statements present a more accurate picture of a company's financial performance and position, reflecting the true economic reality of expected losses.
Why is the direct write off method not accepted by GAAP?
There are two reasons why the direct write-off method is not allowed. First, applying the matching principle implies that the cost of the uncollectible accounts need to be expensed in the period of the sale. Giving credit to customers helps to generate sales (if this were not the case, the firm would simply demand payment at time of delivery). Thus, not creating an allowance violates the matching principle. Second, with the direct write-off method, accounts receivable are at the nominal value, whereas the 'true' value (the amount that is expected to be collectible) is most likely lower. Thus, the direct write-off is likely to overstate the value of accounts receivable.
Identify and state two generally accepted accounting principles that relate to adjusting the accounts?
The matching principle and the revenue recogntion principle.
When comparing the direct write-off and allowance methods what applies to the direct write-off method?
The direct write-off method recognizes bad debt expenses only when an account is deemed uncollectible, leading to a potential mismatch between revenues and expenses in the same period. This method does not adhere to the matching principle of accounting, as it can distort financial statements by not estimating uncollectible accounts in advance. Consequently, it is typically used by small businesses or for tax purposes, where simplicity is preferred over accuracy in financial reporting. However, it may not be compliant with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for larger companies.
State two generally accepted accounting principles that relate to adjusting the accounts?
I believe the answer is Revenue recognition Principle and Matching Principle. Can anyone confirm.
Why is the Direct Write off Method of accounting for uncollectible accounts not generally accepted?
The Direct Write-Off Method is not generally accepted because it violates the matching principle of accounting, which requires expenses to be matched with the revenues they help generate. This method recognizes bad debt expenses only when an account is deemed uncollectible, potentially distorting financial statements by not accurately reflecting the financial position in the period when the revenue was recognized. Additionally, it can lead to fluctuating profits and mislead investors, making it less reliable for assessing a company's financial health.
What principle assumption or constraint does the direct write off method violate if uncollectibles are significant?
The accounts receivables will need to match the bad debt being written, and therefore this applies to the matching principle in accounting.
The process of recording revenue in the period it is earned is in line with which principle?
Matching Principle.
What is the difference between accrual accounting and matching principle?
Matching principle is the base of accrual accounting system which tells that each revenue earned should be matched with cost spent to earn that revenue so accrual account and matching principle is not different but same thing.
How do you account for bad debts?
The matching principle requires that the cost of bad debts (defaults) need to be anticipated as an expense in the period of the sale. (Since allowing customers credit does increase sales.)A 'buffer' needs to be created in the period of the sale, that can absorb losses in future periods in case of default. There are two methods to do this.Percentage of sales methodWith the percentage of sales method a percentage of the sales is book as an expense.Ageing of accounts methodWith the aging of accounts method, the risk in end of period accounts receivables is estimated. Expenses are booked so that the allowance (buffer) can absorb this amount of losses.
What is the different between accounting principle and accounting principle?
Matching principle is the base of accrual accounting system which tells that each revenue earned should be matched with cost spent to earn that revenue so accrual account and matching principle is not different but same thing.
