The principal advantage of the completed-contract method is that
Difference between Percentage of Completion method and Completed Contract method?
A con of the completed contract method of accounting is that nothing is noted in the ledger until the contract is completed. A pro is that there will be less paperwork in accepting partial payments.
D) MACRSSilly accounting students posting questions for their homework....
When you start from net income to calculate the operativ cashflow you have to (1) add (substract) all operativ expenses (income) that appear in the income statement but did not result in cash in- or outflow, and (2) add (substract) all operativ cash inflow (outflow) that were not income (expense) and thus not recorded in the income statement. The net income plus all these adjustments equals the operativ cashflow. Depreciation were recorded in the income statement as an expense but it did not result in an cash outflow. You have to add it therefore to the net income. The method described above is the indirect method to calculate the operativ cash flow.
The principal advantage of the completed-contract method is that
Difference between Percentage of Completion method and Completed Contract method?
A con of the completed contract method of accounting is that nothing is noted in the ledger until the contract is completed. A pro is that there will be less paperwork in accepting partial payments.
The completed contract method of accounting is used for long-term contracts to recognize revenue and expenses only when the contract is fully completed. This approach is beneficial for projects where it is difficult to estimate the percentage of completion or when the outcome is uncertain. It provides a clear view of profitability at the conclusion of the project, as all costs and revenues are recorded at once, avoiding potential distortions in financial statements during the contract's duration. However, this method can lead to significant fluctuations in reported income, as revenue is recognized only at the end of the contract.
The Product MethodThe Income Method or theThe Expenditure Method
This method is used for long-term projects when there is a contract, and reliable estimates of production completed, revenues and costs are possible.
yes they will
At the end of the contract the same amount will have been recognized under both methods for the entire period of the contract. However, the final year of the contract will not usually be the same under both methods. In other words, if a contract spans 2 years, the percentage completion will pick up part of the income in year one and part in year 2. The combined total picked up in both years under percentage completion will be the amount reported under completed contract in year 2 (nothing will be picked up in year 1).
prepere all necessary and materials etc.
As the percentage of completion method requires definite receipts but estimated costs so this method is not advisable when receipts of contract are not given. In this scenario there generally appears no contract so it must be the case of a builder who intends to sell the constructed completed project after incurring self costs. In such situations the completion method suits the best.In case the project has been finalised with fixedcontract price and the contractor has his own estimated costs or else the contractor/ builder has entered into contract with various parties ( the prospective buyers) , in advance( before commencing the project/ billing etc.,), with sure receipts then the percentage of completion method is better to be adopted.
Following are the method of national income accounting :-Product MethodExpenditure MethodIncome Method
D) MACRSSilly accounting students posting questions for their homework....