company secretary cours ka ragistration kaha per hoga . aour eski study kahaper hogi
Direct cost is cost of product while direct costing is the process which study or accounts the direct cost allocation to products.
Logically the both study the same courses and subjects but with the difference of name and code of subjects, as both qualifications follow IAS, IFRSs issued by IASB.The only difference is the name and the rest are rumours to make ACCA flop in competition with CAFor attaining CA qualification it is a must that you should intern at a accountancy practice while you are studying. But for ACCA you can gain your practical experience as you like.And other thing is that ACCA has somewhat wider acceptance globally. But CA is considered more "prestigious"The single most important difference between Acca and CA-ICAP is, CA a local qualification whereas ACCA is an international qualification.
typically they include (as they may apply) things like: trustee fees, escrow fees, bond counsel (for a tax opinion), disclosure counsel (for ongoing reporting of changes which would materially affect the bond holders), printing, study fees (feasability and the like), and accounting fees.
The concepts of tax buoyancy and tax efficiency are used to measure the responsiveness of tax revenue to economic growth. Tax buoyancy is a crude measure which does not distinguish between discretionary and automatic growth of revenue. Elasticity is a preferred measure of tax responsiveness since it controls for automatic revenue changes. In this study, the buoyancies and elasticities of the major taxes in a representative developing economy, the Ivory Coast, are estimated using alternative estimation techniques and comparisons between buoyancies and elasticities are drawn. In general, tax receipts in the Ivory Coast tend to be slightly inelastic while particular taxes such as the value added tax are highly elastic. The results of the study have important policy and research implications.
A reporting study aims to present findings or data based on an analysis of existing information, while a descriptive study seeks to describe a phenomenon, situation, or group without manipulating any variables. Reporting studies typically analyze data collected by others, while descriptive studies involve collecting data firsthand.
there is no difference between them. In both cources , you have to study the same things. applied economics includes some more study than general economics.
Differentiate between work study and method study.
Yes, a cross-sectional study can be a descriptive study as it involves collecting data at a single point in time to describe a population or phenomenon. It focuses on determining prevalence or association between variables at that specific time without following individuals over time.
Descriptive theories aim to describe and explain how things are, based on observation and data. Prescriptive theories, on the other hand, provide recommendations or guidelines on how things should be or how people should act, based on values or norms.
at is the difference between natural products and pharmacognosy
A: BIG DIFFERENCE emitting is the study of electronics conduction is the study of current flow
learn and studey
advantages of the study
nkldnkgbhnb
In a descriptive study, the focus is on observing and describing a phenomenon without manipulating any variables. Therefore, a hypothesis is not typically used in descriptive studies. Instead, researchers aim to provide a detailed and accurate account of the characteristics of the subject under study.
The difference is that Economy is a system and Economics is the study of something.