0
What is the percentage of retained earnings companies usually keep in their coffers?
It depends on situation as well as company policies, if company has good investing opportunity available it may opt for no dividend and if no opportunity available it may go for full distribution as well company can opt for fixed percentage or fixed amount of dividend distribution.
What else can I help you with?
How do California's industries benefit the state?
They provide employment for state residents, and pay taxes into the state's coffers.
Why are employees such a major expense for bank?
The employees are such an expense for banks because of they must be paid well. There are some who plan with robbers on how to steal from the coffers of the bank.
Why not raise the withholding limit for FICA?
Especially as at @110K a year it covers the overwhelming majority of workers, it just may not add that much to the coffers. More than that, the higher earners through life pay much more in and don't get (proportionally) the same amount back (Someone making 55K for life doesn't get half of what someone making 110K does...the higher earner gets a touch more). But more importantly, wealthy people, those who (either by ability or responsibility) have saved and planned for their retirement, generally giving up things in life to do it then may have assets - investments and savings that produce income for them, which reduces (or effectively taxes) their social security payout compared to those who gave in less and gave up less. Wouldn't it be better/fairer/financially more successful to tax those people who can't show they have some level (depending on age - say form 35 years old and more) of committed retirement savings to rely on other rather than only the payments from them system? (AND letting everyone that participated get an equal return).
What would happen if there were no taxes?
Actually taxation without representation or the tea party was not based upon being taxed, but being taxed unfairly.That is how I tell the story of the Boston Tea Party, now that I have read a first-person account of it. While striving to understand my nation's struggles against corporations, in a rare book store I came upon a first edition of "Retrospect of the Boston Tea Party with a Memoir of George R.T. Hewes, a Survivor of the Little Band of Patriots Who Drowned the Tea in Boston Harbor in 1773," and I jumped at the chance to buy it. Because the identities of the Boston Tea Party participants were hidden (other than Samuel Adams) and all were sworn to secrecy for the next 50 years, this account is the only first-person account of the event by a participant that exists. As I read, I began to understand the true causes of the American Revolution.I learned that the Boston Tea Party resembled in many ways the growing modern-day protests against transnational corporations and small-town efforts to protect themselves from chain-store retailers or factory farms. The Tea Party's participants thought of themselves as protesters against the actions of the multinational East India Company.Although schoolchildren are usually taught that the American Revolution was a rebellion against "taxation without representation," akin to modern day conservative taxpayer revolts, in fact what led to the revolution was rage against a transnational corporation that, by the 1760s, dominated trade from China to India to the Caribbean, and controlled nearly all commerce to and from North America, with subsidies and special dispensation from the British crown.Hewes notes: "The [East India] Company received permission to transport tea, free of all duty, from Great Britain to America…" allowing it to wipe out New England-based tea wholesalers and mom-and-pop stores and take over the tea business in all of America. "Hence," wrote, "it was no longer the small vessels of private merchants, who went to vend tea for their own account in the ports of the colonies, but, on the contrary, ships of an enormous burthen, that transported immense quantities of this commodity ... The colonies were now arrived at the decisive moment when they must cast the dye, and determine their course ... "A pamphlet was circulated through the colonies called The Alarm and signed by an enigmatic "Rusticus." One issue made clear the feelings of colonial Americans about England's largest transnational corporation and its behavior around the world: "Their Conduct in Asia, for some Years past, has given simple Proof, how little they regard the Laws of Nations, the Rights, Liberties, or Lives of Men. They have levied War, excited Rebellions, dethroned lawful Princes, and sacrificed Millions for the Sake of Gain. The Revenues of Mighty Kingdoms have entered their Coffers. And these not being sufficient to glut their Avarice, they have, by the most unparalleled Barbarities, Extortions, and Monopolies, stripped the miserable Inhabitants of their Property, and reduced whole Provinces to Indigence and Ruin. Fifteen hundred Thousands, it is said, perished by Famine in one Year, not because the Earth denied its Fruits; but [because] this Company and their Servants engulfed all the Necessaries of Life, and set them at so high a Price that the poor could not purchase them."After protesters had turned back the Company's ships in Philadelphia and New York, Hewes writes, "In Boston the general voice declared the time was come to face the storm."The citizens of the colonies were preparing to throw off one of the corporations that for almost 200 years had determined nearly every aspect of their lives through its economic and political power. They were planning to destroy the goods of the world's largest multinational corporation, intimidate its employees, and face down the guns of the government that supported it.The queen's corporationThe East India Company's influence had always been pervasive in the colonies. Indeed, it was not the Puritans but the East India Company that founded America. The Puritans traveled to America on ships owned by the East India Company, which had already established the first colony in North America, at Jamestown, in the Company-owned Commonwealth of Virginia, stretching from the Atlantic Ocean to the Mississippi. The commonwealth was named after the "Virgin Queen," Elizabeth, who had chartered the corporation.Elizabeth was trying to make England a player in the new global trade sparked by the European "discovery" of the Americas. The wealth Spain began extracting from the New World caught the attention of the European powers. In many European countries, particularly Holland and France, consortiums were put together to finance ships to sail the seas. In 1580, Queen Elizabeth became the largest shareholder in The Golden Hind, a ship owned by Sir Francis Drake.The investment worked out well for Queen Elizabeth. There's no record of exactly how much she made when Drake paid her share of the Hind's dividends to her, but it was undoubtedly vast, since Drake himself and the other minor shareholders all received a 5000 percent return on their investment. Plus, because the queen placed a maximum loss to the initial investors of their investment amount only, it was a low-risk investment (for the investors at least-creditors, such as suppliers of provisions for the voyages or wood for the ships, or employees, for example, would be left unpaid if the venture failed, just as in a modern-day corporation). She was endorsing an investment model that led to the modern limited-liability corporation.After making a fortune on Drake's expeditions, Elizabeth started looking for a more permanent arrangement. She authorized a group of 218 London merchants and noblemen to form a corporation. The East India Company was born on December 31, 1600.By the 1760s, the East India Company's power had grown massive and worldwide. However, this rapid expansion, trying to keep ahead of the Dutch trading companies, was a mixed blessing, as the company went deep in debt to support its growth, and by 1770 found itself nearly bankrupt.The company turned to a strategy that multinational corporations follow to this day: They lobbied for laws that would make it easy for them to put their small-business competitors out of business.Most of the members of the British government and royalty (including the king) were stockholders in the East India Company, so it was easy to get laws passed in its interests. Among the Company's biggest and most vexing problems were American colonial entrepreneurs, who ran their own small ships to bring tea and other goods directly into America without routing them through Britain or through the Company. Between 1681 and 1773, a series of laws were passed granting the Company monopoly on tea sold in the American colonies and exempting it from tea taxes. Thus, the Company was able to lower its tea prices to undercut the prices of the local importers and the small tea houses in every town in America. But the colonists were unappreciative of their colonies being used as a profit center for the multinational corporation.Boston's million-dollar tea partyAnd so, Hewes says, on a cold November evening of 1773, the first of the East India Company's ships of tax-free tea arrived. The next morning, a pamphlet was widely circulated calling on patriots to meet at Faneuil Hall to discuss resistance to the East India Company and its tea. "Things thus appeared to be hastening to a disastrous issue. The people of the country arrived in great numbers, the inhabitants of the town assembled. This assembly, on the 16th of December 1773, was the most numerous ever known, there being more than 2000 from the country present," said Hewes.The group called for a vote on whether to oppose the landing of the tea. The vote was unanimously affirmative, and it is related by one historian of that scene "that a person disguised after the manner of the Indians, who was in the gallery, shouted at this juncture, the cry of war; and that the meeting dissolved in the twinkling of an eye, and the multitude rushed in a mass to Griffin's wharf."That night, Hewes dressed as an Indian, blackening his face with coal dust, and joined crowds of other men in hacking apart the chests of tea and throwing them into the harbor. In all, the 342 chests of tea-over 90,000 pounds-thrown overboard that night were enough to make 24 million cups of tea and were valued by the East India Company at 9,659 Pounds Sterling or, in today's currency, just over $1 million.In response, the British Parliament immediately passed the Boston Port Act stating that the port of Boston would be closed until the citizens of Boston reimbursed the East India Company for the tea they had destroyed. The colonists refused. A year and a half later, the colonists would again state their defiance of the East India Company and Great Britain by taking on British troops in an armed conflict at Lexington and Concord (the "shots heard 'round the world") on April 19, 1775.That war-finally triggered by a transnational corporation and its government patrons trying to deny American colonists a fair and competitive local marketplace-would end with independence for the colonies.The revolutionaries had put the East India Company in its place with the Boston Tea Party, and that, they thought, was the end of that. Unfortunately, the Boston Tea Party was not the end; within 150 years, during the so-called Gilded Age, powerful rail, steel, and oil interests would rise up to begin a new form of oligarchy, capturing the newly-formed Republican Party in the 1880s, and have been working to establish a permanent wealthy and ruling class in this country ever since.Permission to reprint by Thom Hartmann
Where can one purchase vintage coffers?
One can purchase vintage coffers from various online stores. Some of these stores are Amazon, eBay, Selling Antiques, Antiques Atlas, Kate's Coffers and Magic Cards.
What is coffers?
A coffer slab is a sunken ceiling panel. They are often decorated with moldings, carvings, or paint. The coffers are usually set between the beams and cross-beams.
What are the royal coffers?
The royal coffers refer to the treasury or financial resources of a monarchy or royal family. These coffers contain the wealth and assets of the ruling monarch, which are used to fund the expenses of the royal household, government operations, and other royal activities. The royal coffers may consist of various sources of revenue, such as taxes, tariffs, land holdings, and other forms of income that belong to the monarchy. Proper management of the royal coffers is crucial for the financial stability and sustainability of the monarchy.
How did king george propose to add revenue to his coffers?
He imposed taxes.
What actors and actresses appeared in The Coffers - 2012?
The cast of The Coffers - 2012 includes: Kasi Engler as Housekeeping Billy Mayo as Raymond Farnsworth Russell Towne as Chortlemer Billiam Prentice Williams as Jeris Farnsworth
Why sales tax is required?
It is simply a lucrative way of filling the government coffers.
How do California's industries benefit the state?
They provide employment for state residents, and pay taxes into the state's coffers.
How do California's industry benefit the state?
They provide employment for state residents, and pay taxes into the state's coffers.
What is a Homophone for cough?
I think there is no homophone for cough but there is a homophone for: cougher -- coffer coughers -- coffers
How much money did dianna ross get in her dvorce?
Reportedly she's got about $260million in her coffers. Not bad at all. Pretty good, actually.
What was the goal of the Spaniards in the early colonial economy of Mexico?
To mine as much gold and silver as possible to enrich the coffers of the Spanish Empire.
Is having a 7 trillion dollar debt a problem?
First of all its problem, not promblem. Secondly, yes it is. America has the smallest coffers in the world.
