Several red flags could indicate a potential fraudulent claim, such as inconsistent or contradictory information in the claim details, an unusually high frequency of claims from the same individual, or a lack of supporting documentation. Additionally, claims that involve high-value items with minimal proof of ownership or claims filed shortly after purchasing insurance can also raise suspicion. Unusual patterns or behaviors, such as a claimant being evasive or overly aggressive in pursuing a settlement, may further warrant investigation.
I would yes
Unfortunately no. You would have to had worked in the year 2008 to file taxes. In order to claim your children you would have to work and file taxes.
No. My mother would not let me let you claim her on your income tax return. Even if I could claim my mother on my return I would not let you claim her on your return. My mother will be claiming herself on her own return. Nice try though. If you are interested in possibly claiming your own mother on your own return, I would recommend reading the Form 1040 instructions for line 6c, step 4. In a nutshell, if your mother lived with you all year, had minimal income, and you provided over half her support, you may be eligible to claim your mother on your return.
The journal entry for goods destroyed by rain, with an insurance claim of 90,000 admitted by the insurance company, would involve recognizing the loss of the inventory and the insurance receivable. The entry would be: Debit "Loss from Inventory Write-off" for 90,000. Credit "Inventory" for 90,000. Debit "Insurance Receivable" for 90,000 when the claim is recognized. Credit "Insurance Income" for 90,000 once the claim is received. This reflects the loss of goods and the expected recovery from the insurance claim.
Yes as long he and you meet the qualifications for you claim him as your qualifying child dependent on your income tax return. He would have to file his own income tax return reporting his own income and he would not be able to claim himself for exemption amount on his own income tax return.
The system would check the dates of posting and note that the claim is fraudulent.
Yes. If you filed a claim a "PILR" and/or "CIB" check would alert the insurer of any and all prior claims made.
An antonym for alert would be notify or inform.
You would have to be able to prove that the inspection sticker is not fraudulent, otherwise there is no way to beat it.
Fraudulent behavior is when someone is being dishonest and could be something like someone saying if you sent me $5000 I will get you to Canada and then once they have the money they would steal it and you would never hear from them again.
Alan Weidman would most likely agree with the claim that technology has the potential to revolutionize healthcare by improving efficiency, access to care, and patient outcomes. He is known for his work in advancing technology in the healthcare sector.
You would probably have to contact the Moshi Monsters staff and have them send out a notice. However, it would depend on what the alert is about. It would have to be something pretty serious for Moshi Monsters staff to even consider sending out an alert.
Scam would fit this definition.
If you were the insured under the policy and were suspected of making the fraudulent claim, the first step would probably be that the insurer would issue a "reservation of rights". This means that the insurer is "reserving" its rights to later disclaim coverage pending a further investigation of the claim. This is a letter sent to the insured so stating, and is required because most states impose time limits on insurers to settle undisputed claims. Therefore, this is a way to ensure that all parties know that the claim is disputed, and therefore, that the "undisputed" time frame does not apply. As part of the investigation of a suspected fraudulent claim, the insurer will probably also conduct an "examination under oath". The insured or other persons having an interest in getting the claim paid will be put under oath and asked questions that are material to whether or not, based upon the facts, the occurrence is covered by the policy. After this is done, the insurer will make a determination, usually based upon consultation with its lawyers, whether there is a sufficient basis to deny coverage, or whether it should be paid or compromised. In making that determination, it will consider the chances of defeat in a lawsuit based upon a denial of coverage. If the insurer loses the coverage suit, not only will it be found liable for the claim, but in most states, it will also have to pay the claimant's attorney's fees. More importantly, it sets a precedent for the interpretation of that policy language.
There are various companies that offer medical alert monitoring services. The two companies that offer this service would be Lifestation and Life Alert.
I would describe "what if your luck will improve?" as a speculation rather than a claim. If I said "your luck will improve" I would be making a claim. Whether it would be a justifiable claim would depend upon the circumstances.
Many would claim God. Others would claim evolution.