Because in ABC costing overheads are allocated based on activities performed by departments rather based on any rate or formula that's why as much activity any department perform as much cost will be allocated which is more accurate way of allocation.
what is plantwide manufacturing overhead
Two key assumptions for using a plantwide overhead rate are that all products consume overhead resources in the same proportion and that the overhead costs are driven primarily by a single cost driver, typically direct labor hours or machine hours. This simplification allows for easier allocation of overhead costs across all products but may not accurately reflect the actual overhead consumption for each product, especially in diverse manufacturing environments. As a result, this method may lead to over- or under-costing of products.
A departmental overhead absorption rate is a cost accounting metric used to allocate overhead costs to specific departments or production units within an organization. It is calculated by dividing the total overhead costs for a department by an appropriate allocation base, such as direct labor hours, machine hours, or production volume. This rate helps in accurately assigning costs to products or services, facilitating better pricing and profitability analysis. By using this method, companies can ensure that overhead costs are systematically absorbed into product costs, leading to more informed financial decision-making.
Activity based costing allocate the overhead expenses based on activities performed and that's why it is an accurate way to allocate overhead expenses while in absorption costing, overheads are allocated based on some ratios or predetermined rate which is not accurate method of allocation of cost.
The following are the differences between allocation and apportionment. 1. Allocation costs are directly allocated to cost centre. Overhead which cannot be directly allocated are apportioned on some suitable basis. 2. Allocation allots whole amount of cost to cost centre or cost unit where as apportionment allots part of cost to cost centre or cost unit. 3. No basis required for allocation. Apportionment is made on the basis of area, assets value, number of workers etc.
Yes, using a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours could result in significantly different overhead cost allocations compared to a departmental approach. Plantwide rates average costs across the entire facility, which may not accurately reflect the overhead consumption of specific departments with varying processes and resource needs. This could lead to over- or under-costing of jobs in certain departments, affecting pricing and profitability decisions. In contrast, departmental rates provide a more tailored allocation that can better match actual resource usage.
what is plantwide manufacturing overhead
Two key assumptions for using a plantwide overhead rate are that all products consume overhead resources in the same proportion and that the overhead costs are driven primarily by a single cost driver, typically direct labor hours or machine hours. This simplification allows for easier allocation of overhead costs across all products but may not accurately reflect the actual overhead consumption for each product, especially in diverse manufacturing environments. As a result, this method may lead to over- or under-costing of products.
Departmental overhead rates are an expense assigned to products associated with a particular department. Overhead rates help businesses remain within the boundaries of a budget.
Incorporating departmental overhead costs in your prices helps you cover the costs of production. Unfortunately, it may make your price more than your competitors.
One method that accounts for all the overhead in a plant, for example, can be included in a single kind of overhead allocation.
A departmental overhead absorption rate is a cost accounting metric used to allocate overhead costs to specific departments or production units within an organization. It is calculated by dividing the total overhead costs for a department by an appropriate allocation base, such as direct labor hours, machine hours, or production volume. This rate helps in accurately assigning costs to products or services, facilitating better pricing and profitability analysis. By using this method, companies can ensure that overhead costs are systematically absorbed into product costs, leading to more informed financial decision-making.
Activity based costing allocate the overhead expenses based on activities performed and that's why it is an accurate way to allocate overhead expenses while in absorption costing, overheads are allocated based on some ratios or predetermined rate which is not accurate method of allocation of cost.
The best method for allocating overhead in construction is a way that's fair. After all, the idea is to allocate (or, distribute) costs that each job shares responsibility for — meaning the job either caused or benefited from the cost The plantwide and department allocation methods are “traditional” approaches because both typically use direct labor hours, direct labor costs, or machine hours as the allocation base, and both were used prior to the creation of activity-based costing in the 1980s.
Predetermined overhead rate = Est. total Manuf. Overhead Cost / Est. total amt of allocation base In this case, allocation base would be direct labor (as opposed to machine labor). Hope this helps
The benefit of determining overhead absorption rates, according to departments is that it is usually hard to pin certain overhead costs to specific products. It is better for each department to relate to a certain overhead than a specific product.
In Blanket Overhead Absorption Rate applied is the same however it may differ if a company follow Departmental method Or frther break - up method