Depends on the weight of the aircraft. A 747 has bigger wings than a A320 but that doesn't mean it will glide longer because a 747 weighs much more than a A320. This is to do with weight opposing the lift force. The more weight, the more lift has to be created in order to overcome it (And then provide extra lift to climb). Hypothetically, putting 747 wings on an a320 would mean it would glide longer yes, but obviously in reality this isn't possible for structural reasons.
An airplane.
a large fuselage with two wings and a big jets
No, by hydraulic rams.
they glide, as the name implies. it's like a paper airplane. its surface area is big so it sorta "floats" on air.
No, the Space Shuttle is not an airplane in the classic sense. The Shuttle cannot "fly" from place to place like an airplane -- it must be carried from place to place on Earth on the back of an airplane. By the classic definition, an airplane is craft that uses power (engines) to push or pull it through the air while using the "lift" created on the wings to keep it aloft (in the air). The Shuttle uses power during launch, but like a rocket, pushing it up -- the wings are not used to keep it aloft. During reentry power is not pushing it through the air, it is sailing through the air (using the lift on its wings) like a big glider. So, at no time is the Shuttle being pushed through the air while using its wings for lift.
Bats could fly by using their wings by flapping them up and down. When they flap their wings up it is called the upstroke and when they flap it down it is called the downstroke. To regane their energy they glide in the sky to get it all back. Wings of a small bat species are different from those of birds.
just throw it properly and make a very big one
Flightless Birds like the Emu and Ostrich tend to have big heavy legs and small wings. Birds that can fly are more streamlined and have bigger wings. These wings have cross-sections shaped like those of aeroplanes enabling them to glide. Their feathers are flat and light in weight. Some of the bones in their skeletons are hollow as well.
Flightless birds like the Emu and Ostrich tend to have big heavy legs and small wings. Birds that can fly are more streamlined and have bigger wings. These wings have cross-sections shaped like those of aeroplanes enabling them to glide. Their feathers are flat and light in weight. Some of the bones in their skeletons are hollow as well.
Although this is a good question it requires a simple answer. Even though an ostrich is much lighter its wings are not big enough to accommodate for its size. An airplane is huge but the designer new that and made engines that could easily accommodate. So in basic the airplane has so much more power therefore giving it flight. While the ostrich wings just aren't powerful enough.
we can do hundred missions we have many big airplane you can try
Yes, it can. Weight, number of folds, and wingspan are all factors in making a paper airplane fly farther. A long-distance paper airplane (glider) should have large wings, a small fuselage, and evenly distributed (but also light) weight. It should be held and thrown from the center of gravity.