yes it does
Have is not a "to be" verb. Present tense forms of be: am/is/are Past tense forms of be: was/were Being is the present participle, and been is the past participle.
NO!!! It is the past tense of the verb 'to have'. Present tense I have You have He/she/they have Past Tense I Had You had He/she/they had Future Tense I shall have You will have He/she/they will have Not the use of 'shall/will'
"Have not" is the present perfect tense, indicating a lack of possession or experience up to the present moment, such as in "I have not finished my homework." In contrast, "had not" is the past perfect tense, used to describe a lack of possession or experience before a certain point in the past, like in "I had not finished my homework before the deadline." Essentially, "have not" relates to the present, while "had not" relates to the past.
No, it is not. It is the past tense and past participle of the verb to offer (present, propose). It can be a verb form, a participial, or an adjective (e.g. offered terms).
stidiedhas studied because this leaves a sense of present tense where as will study is future tense and had studied is past tense and to put stuied is a simlpe form of the past tense.
The present perfect tense uses the past participle.
The tense that uses "had" is the past perfect tense, while the tense that uses "have" is the present perfect tense.
No. Were is a past tense of "be". The present perfect tense uses "have" and "has".
Neutron source Alpha rays source for radiotherapy
Present continuous uses present tense be verbs ie am / is / are.I am walking the park. He is walking to the park. They are walking to the park.Past continuous uses past tense be verbs ie was / were.I was walking to the park. He was walking to the park. They were walking to the park
Lamborghini uses a bull but it is not winged. I know of no company past or present that uses a winged bull.
Yes, that's correct. When the past tense is used in an independent clause, the dependent clause usually uses present tense. This creates a sense of harmony and sequence in the sentence.
past: I was; you were; he/she/it was present: I am; you are; he/she/it is
No, the past participle is a verb form that is used in the formation of perfect tenses, passive voice, and other constructions, while the present perfect tense is a specific tense that uses the present tense of the auxiliary verb "have" followed by the past participle of the main verb. So the past participle is a verb form, while the present perfect is a tense.
Have is present tense. The past tense is had.
There is a past, present, and future. There was a past; there is a present and there will be a future.
The key use of aluminum is in aircraft construction. It has many other uses too.