No, it's the comparative form of neat (an adjective).
sexer
illiterate:read::sightless:see hovel:poverty::hut:shelter lemon:citrus::wheat:grain red:green::blue:orange (because these colors are composite)
yes part of the verb "to be" I am he is she is it is you are we are they are
It is a helping verb.
verb
neater is to tidier as messier is to sloppier
More neat, neater is not proper grammar.
sexer
neater
it is a place that is neater
cleaner
fastidious
No, but many people use such colloquially. Neater is a comparative adjective (positive-neat,comparative-neater, superlative-neatest). Comparatives and superlatives are not generally modified, other than where necessary by an article (the neatest). Comparatives are typically preceded by a verb and followed by the conjunction than.That is a technical treatment, the wordy form. The short answer is just no. It is redundant to try to modify a comparative adjective. It's sort of like trying to say, "There is more more water in the Pacific Ocean than any other."
Neat -- Neater-- Neatest
tidy
The capital of the Netherlands is Amsterdam.
1. cheater 2. heater 3. theatre