The analogy of "go is to went" implies a change in tense from present to past. To maintain this pattern, the analogy of "do is to" would require a change in tense as well. The past tense of "do" is "did," so the analogy would be "do is to did."
I also wanna
analogy is comparison of two question
The purpose of analogy is to explain or clarify. When you make an analogy, you make comparisons between two things.
Assert : Deny what would that analogy be?
No, tomorrow is yesterday's future since tomorrow hasn't yet happened. But you could say yesterday is tomorrow's past since it has already happened.
Today is the present. Tomorrow is the future. Yesterday is the past. Tomorrow as yesterday happens the day after. Incidentally, tomorrow never comes.
today
No, "I will see you tomorrow" is future tense.
always
today is yesterdays tomorrow, and today is tomorrows yesterday
There is no past tense for final. Eg. The final will be tomorrow. The final was yesterday.
Today If this is Wednesday, then on Tuesday, Wednesday was 'tomorrow', and on Thursday it will be 'yesterday'.
past present and future- time.
There is no tomorrow forget it, what ever is that is Today and yesterday was past that is for forget or for to lean only. so today is universal truth there is no further argument against it
Tomorrow's Yesterday was created in 2006.
tomorrow's yesterday