answersLogoWhite

0

"could" asumes it may have, "would" asumes it was.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What the difference between been to and been in?

Much the same as the difference between to and in.


Why is the difference between xylem and phloem important in a plant?

There is structural difference between xylem and phloem. This is because their function is also different. Had there been no difference in structure, how these could have performed different function?


What is the difference between the Vietnam war and the Domino theory?

There is no difference. It would have been more difficult to get involved in Vietnam WITHOUT the domino theory.


Difference between had and had been?

one has been on the end


What is the difference between was and had been?

had been is before and was is just there


What is the difference between 'you had been studying' and 'you were studying'?

Here's an amateur's take on it. "Were" would be used when talking about the near past. "Had been" would be used to draw attention to a longer time-span between your studying and the present.


What is the difference between conclusion and evaluation?

A conclusion explains what you found out by your research. An evaluation explains what went well and what could have been improved and how.


What is difference between taxi and cab?

They mean the same A handsome cab was horse drawn. A taxi could have been water transportation.


How many years difference is there between 250 be and 250 CE?

499. Had there been a year 0 it would have been 500.499. Had there been a year 0 it would have been 500.499. Had there been a year 0 it would have been 500.499. Had there been a year 0 it would have been 500.


What is the difference between Have you ever been to and have you been to?

Have you ever been to or have you been to are just ways of saying the same thing. A person would say this asking if someone has been to a specific place in question.


What is the difference between aptitude and skills in psychology?

The difference between Aptitude and Skills is that Aptitude could be the potential, which has as yet not been tapped and trained to a skill level. Whereas skills, as the word describes is, it is present here and now in the individual.


What is the difference between hypothesis and law?

A hypothesis is what someone suggests could be true, and then tests it to see whether or not it is true. A law is what has been proven to be true.