for it
gives fresh ideas
gets rid of legislators who have been there too long
against it
gets rid of experienced legislators
Term limits have been proposed because for the most part people do not like career politicians. The solution is to simply vote them out of office. Another thing that might help is to make illegal the gerrymandering of districts so politicians cannot rework the districts in the favor of their political party.
1. Why do you think that terms limits would resolved the problems that they are claimed to solve? or is the electorate to blame for legislative problems. 2. What arguments are articulated against term limits?
The two main arguments against scientism are that it limits human knowledge by disregarding other forms of understanding, such as philosophy and art, and that it can lead to a reductionist view of the world, ignoring the complexities of human experience and existence.
it violated the civil liberties of u.s citizens.
It's a term which refers usually to arguments against or criticism of Islam.
Claim B, "Senators should not have term limits," is arguable because it presents an opinion that can be debated, with potential arguments for and against the idea of term limits for senators. In contrast, claims A and C are factual statements, and claim D is incomplete but seems to imply a factual assertion about political representation.
It limits the civil liberties of Americans.
The constitutions has two term limits. The two term limits are ratified the Constitution and the federal constitution convention.
Arguments against economic integration world leader command?
There are no real, good arguments against planning. Having a plan is important in many cases.
are you for or against voluntary work
Term Limits - novel - was created in 1997-08.