Generally speaking, a front wheel drive vehicle is better for driving in snow. This is because the weight of the engine rests on the driving wheels, allowing them to achieve better traction.
4 Wheel drive is better. It gives more road surface selection to get the most traction four wheel drive because 4 is better than 2 hands down but front wheel drive is better than rear wheel drive
I would say front wheel drive
The 2005 Chrysler Sebring convertible is a front-wheel-drive vehicle. This design provides better traction in various driving conditions and contributes to a more compact layout. The front-wheel-drive configuration is common in many midsize cars from that era.
Back wheel drive
Yes. A Front wheel drive
Yes. A Front wheel drive
The Cadillac SRX is available in both front-wheel drive (FWD) and all-wheel drive (AWD) configurations. The front-wheel drive version provides better fuel efficiency and handling in most conditions, while the all-wheel drive option enhances traction on slippery surfaces. Overall, buyers can choose based on their driving needs and preferences.
tually if driving in snow or ice it would be rear for better control otherwise front
front
Rear wheel drive mechnism
If you are driving in 4 wheel drive, put them on the front tires. If you are driving in 2wd ordon'thave 4 wheel drive, put them on the back.
Yes, the 2000 Buick Century is a front-wheel-drive vehicle. It features a transverse front-engine layout, which allows the front wheels to handle both the driving and steering functions. This design is common in many sedans from that era, providing better traction in various driving conditions.