everybody has this question when it comes to comparing the 2004 marauder with the 96 impala ss. both cars are full size sedans with big v8s. most would agree that they are evenly match in the performance department. so what exactly set them apart? well in this case the marauder seem to have the upper edge over the aging SS. the marauder is more modern and tune better than the SS. the SS is a sloppy driving machine. it doesn't corner like the marauder does, the weight is not distributed evenly throughout the car which makes a big difference in driving. basically the marauder would beat the SS but not leave it in the dust, because the SS is not slow, but it just drive differently, plus its much more heavier.
the marauder is superior to the impala SS.
the marauder would beat the SS in a race but it would not blow it away because both cars almost identical in engine packages and everything.
finally it all depends who driving the cars, and how they drive it.
Impala ss
1996 impala ss
The camero will be faster if both are stock
06 impala ss, stock to stock.
dodge intrepid
I would say the jeep is faster.
Yes because the impala has a better engine with more horsepower and torque ratio. But if the Bonneville is an sses and its supercharged then i don't know,
That all depends on what engine is in the charger, the Chevy only has 265 horse.
the charger should be faster. nah me and my friends tried this them chargers are slow my 94 impalas smoked a charger
"KBB does not offer a strict price for a 1996 Impala SS. However, when researched the average selling price for a 1996 Impala SS, they sell for
1996 Impala large sedan, V8 motor 1.8.4.3.6.5.7.2
The 1996 Chevy impala ss