In what way? There were no other cases consolidated with Marbury v. Madison, (1803) if that's what you're asking.
Chat with our AI personalities
William Marbury and James Madison. They were fighting over whether or not Marbury and other federalists, appointed by John Adams, would receive their commissions.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)Marbury v. Madison was heard by the six-member US Supreme Court lead by Chief Justice John Marshall. The unanimous decision was made by a quorum of four Justices (4-0); the other two Justices abstained because they missed the oral arguments due to illness.Chief JusticeJohn MarshallJoined by Associate JusticesWilliam PatersonSamuel ChaseBushrod WashingtonAbstaining JusticesWilliam CushingAlfred Moore* Cushing and Moore did not participate in the Marbury v. Madison case because they missed oral arguments due to illness.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803) is often credited with establishing the right of judicial review, which increased the Court's power and made it more equal to the other branches of government. Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to determine whether legislation is unconstitutional and to overturn those laws.For more in-depth information on Marbury v. Madison (1803), see Related Links, below.
It established the power of judicial review.Marbury v Madison solidified the idea of judicial review, and that the Constitution is superior to other laws... thus a law can be declared unconstitutional by the court.
Chief Justice Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. Madison strengthened the Supreme Court and elevated the Judicial Branch's power to co-equal status with the other branches of government by giving them a tool (judicial review) to apply as a check and balance on the other branches of government.It also annoyed President Jefferson tremendously.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)