2500
raising the most money
A candidate must have access to large amounts of money to be a serious candidate for the presidency.
A political action committee can contribute $5000, provided it contributes to at least five different federal candidates each year. Beyond this, the laws permit corporations, unions, and other interest groups to form political action committees (PACs) and pay the costs of soliciting funds from private citizens for the PACs. However individuals may now contribute no more than $2300 to any candidate for federal office in any primary or general election.
Money.
Federal Election Campaign Act
raising the most money
It gives the candidate the ability to become more famous and for the voter to become more familiar with the candidate like when you see commercials on tv about a candidate.
The candidate who usually has the biggest advantage in a national election is the candidate endorsed by each party.
There is no limit on the ammount of money a candidate is allowed to raise for a single campaign.
First of all a 527 organization seems to be a more broad definition, because a PAC is a form of a 527 organization. Also a PAC has more regulations from the government about the amount of money spent per candidate per election and things of that nature, while from my research I could not really find the same stipulations for just a basic 527 organization. Another thing that makes the two different is that the money from a PAC goes directly to the candidates while money from a 527 organization does not go directly go directly to the candidate.
they can't directly give any, but there are loopholes, like they can form PACs and such.
Special interests, because they directly or indirectly fund the election process. Without their money, any candidate or incumbent cannot hope to win. The reason for this is the massive ad campaigns that are required to "shape" public opinion about a candidate in concert with the character destruction of the opponent. Many bills submitted to congress are actually written by corporations then "sponsored" by a member of congress.
During the 2012 election, most of Mr. Obama's money was raised by individuals and by SuperPACs. But since the election, there is now a new "dark money" group (a group that does not have to disclose who its donors are); it was formed to support the policies of the Obama administration and to raise money to advocate for his priorities. It is called "Organizing for Action."
individuals influence directly what is produced, marketed, and consumed. Individuals do this by spending money on what they want. This then directs producers to produce goods and services that individuals will consume.
Political Action Committees (PACs), these are political arms of businesses, labors, trades, professional or other interest groups, legally authorized to raise funds on a voluntary basis from employees/ members to contribute to a candidate or political party. They can contribute $5000 per candidate per election and $15000 total in an election.
No. A presidential candidate has to pay for campaigning, signs, buttons, a way to get around the country, for commercials, campaign trail expenses, and more. Fundraising can probably provide for most of the money, but running for president is not cheap.
He can join the candidate's campaign or organize a campaign if he does not have one. Money will have to donated by supporters. The campaign engages in activities that publicizes the candidate and his views. Flyers and posters can be printed and workers can post them and go door-to-door to visit people and explain the candidate's position and why he should be elected. Rallies can be held to allow the candidate to speak and radio spots can be aired. Letters supporting the candidate can be written for the local newspaper.