answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

indirect representation

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Colonial governments could be best described as involving?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What are some names of colonial newspapers?

i don't know of any exact newspapers but if you had to do a paper you could name it the Colonial Gezette or something like that


The ability to run state governments without federal intervention?

Under home rule, it was established that the ability to run state governments could be done without federal intervention


What was the reason why most governments were run by whites?

Governments are "run" by the wealthy and powerful. For most of the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries, most of the wealthiest and most powerful nations were European, or - as the U.S. - were founded by Europeans. For much of that period also, European powers conquered much of the rest of the world and put in place colonial governments so they could extract resources. Europeans are typically identified as "white". Today, nearly all national governments are run largely by local elites, though Europe and the U.S. still have great influence. In many nations, the wealthy and powerful of today are descendants of the European colonial powers, who have retained land and resources from that time. Often high status becomes associated with the characteristics of those people (such as lighter skin color) because of this. This combination of wealth, power and status - and the education and networks they acquire - give "white" people the inside track on governmental positions.


The Mayflower Compact could best be described as?

The Mayflower Compact was a document of the Plymouth Colony. It is best described as a step toward genuine self-government.


The Declaration of Independence could best be described as a defining statement of American?

The Declaration of Independence could be described in may ways. There is no "best" one.It was a statement of American existenceIt was a statement of American identityIt was, and still is a statement of American hope for the country and for the people.And, of course, it can be described as a statement of American independence - the very reason for the existence of the document.

Related questions

Could colonial governments declare war?

no


Colonial governments limited suffrage through property.this meant that?

only land owners could vote


What were ways colonial governments not complete democracies?

I think it was because only white men who owned property could vote or be elected representatives


Why did colonial newspapers often have to be careful about what they printed?

Colonial newspapers had to be careful about what they printed because they were often censored by colonial governments or faced libel charges from individuals in power. Publishing controversial or critical content could lead to fines, imprisonment, or even the shutdown of the newspaper. Additionally, colonial newspapers relied on advertising revenue, so offending advertisers could result in financial repercussions.


In colonial governments what did the royal governor do?

He made sure colonists didn't pass any laws that could hurt England A+


What could an archaeopteryx be described?

It could be described as the first bird.


How could Roman consuls be described as?

They could be described as prime ministers.


Who could be a tanner in colonial times?

only people with no children could be a Tanner in colonial times


Was included in Patrick Henry's Virginia resolves?

Colonist could be taxed only by colonial assemblies.


What was included in Patrick Henry's Virginia resolves.?

Colonists could be taxed only by colonial assemblies.


Could be the slogan of fascist governments.?

The slogan of fascist governments could be "Might makes right".


How was world hunger in the past?

It was not such a big deal because people didn't care or were starving themselves. For example in Africa there was no widespread hunger because colonial rule ironically maintained stable governments which could feed their own peoples.