answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

{| |- | It is certainly not as likely. The involvement of the French provided some major victories for the Colonists. Without them the war would have lasted longer. The extremely long line of supply for England was a major short fall at that point in time. The war was also draining the monetary coffers of Englant. |}

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

NO because they weren't that skilled and were out numbered by the British.

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Loopa Loopa

Lvl 1
3y ago
This just made my Soical Studies test way esaier. Thanks.

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Could the Patriots have succeeded in the war without foreign help?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What did the patriots and the loyalists agreed mostly on?

Both groups thought that parliament was more then they could handle because of taxes. None of the two groups liked taxes and wanted to do away with them.But loyalists remained loyal to the king and did as they were told without arguments.As Patriots took a stand!


What nickname did the patriots give to the British soldiers is Minutemen?

British soldiers were also called lobsterbacks because of their red uniforms. Some patriots were known as minutemen because of how quickly the could prepare for battle.


Why was fighting on their own land an advantages for the patriots?

because the Patriots had more weapons and protection on their own land (from 8th grade textbook)> Also, they didn't need to travel, and they knew where the hiding + ambush spots were


For the first part the country's history American foreign policy could be described most accurately as?

A desire for noninvolvement.


How does patriotism destroy a nation?

Patriotism as defined as love for country is not destructive to a nation. But various groups see patriotism as a bad thing because patriots tend think they are better than people from other nations. It could be argued that these patriots would stand on the border telling insults at each other until war broke out to destroy one of them. However, loving one's nation or having pride in one's heritage also forms the cultural glue that holds them together when they need help from one or the other. So a nation of patriots is always better than a nation of anti-patriots.

Related questions

Could the Patriots have succeeded in the war foreign help?

no


Could the patriot have succeeded in the war without foreign help?

no


The patriots could have succeeded in the war without foreign help?

Possibly, England was far away and many were not interested in participating in the war. They had hired Hessians for many of the troops. But it probably would have taken much longer with many more lives lost.


The patriots could have won the revolutionary war without help from other countries?

Yes because they were powerful and had strong and brave soldiers


Could the patriots have won the revolutionary war without help from other countries?

Yes because they were powerful and had strong and brave soldiers


Did the Patriots know they were cheating?

The Patriots did not cheat. Therefore they could not have known they were "cheating".


Why were Patriots willing to fight the British?

The patriots faght the british so that they could have civil rights.


What did the south strategy to win foreign support depend?

Britain decided the test of Confederate viability would be whether Lee succeeded in his invasion of the North in September 1862. When this failed, Lincoln felt confident enough to issue the Emancipation Proclamation. After that, free nations abroad could not aid the Confederates without looking pro-slavery themselves.


On what did the South's strategy to win foreign support depend?

Britain decided the test of Confederate viability would be whether Lee succeeded in his invasion of the North in September 1862. When this failed, Lincoln felt confident enough to issue the Emancipation Proclamation. After that, free nations abroad could not aid the Confederates without looking pro-slavery themselves.


Could fascism have succeeded without Hitler?

Well, maybe if they spent more time preparing, keeping their operations secret, and got someone that was more patient then yes.


Are the patriots loosers?

You could not be more wrong. The Patriots are the team of the decade, and easily have the greatest quarterback in NFL history: TOM BRADY.


Is it is necessary to learn grammar for learning a foreign tongue?

yes because foreign language is like a puzzle.. and without there being grammer you could probably get everything messed up. instead of saying... i need to go to the restroom you could be saying i went to the restroom yesterday.