Q: Did Jefferson's list of grievances made his argument more or less convincing?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about American Government

An authoritative command from Congress directed to a particular arm of government or an institution usually issued to address various concerns or issues such as pollution, security, health and safety in the marketplace, and government service performance and management.

One argument against globalization is that their is more disparity of wealth now. Other arguments against globalization are that the economics of other countries can affect America and countries can lose jobs when other countries will do the work for less.

There are 45 words in the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The First Amendment gives individuals the right to peaceably assemble. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Less Likely To Participate in Community Activities

Related questions

The list can make the argument more convincing by providing specific examples and supporting evidence. It can make the argument less convincing if the examples are weak or irrelevant to the main point being argued. Ultimately, the effectiveness of the list in strengthening the argument depends on the relevance and quality of the examples provided.

Type your answer here... A logical fallacy

they want to point out flaws in the reasoning or logic of the opposing argument to weaken its credibility and strengthen their own position. Identifying fallacies can help to expose weak points or errors in the opponent's argument, making their position less convincing to the audience. By highlighting fallacies, the person aims to persuade others that their own argument is stronger and more valid.

It gave him less power over the courts

Recycling, Carpooling, Planting Trees, Smoking less, Convincing cows to fart less

Aldous Huxley said that quote.

powpublic static double pow(double a, double b) Returns the value of the first argument raised to the power of the second argument. Special cases: If the second argument is positive or negative zero, then the result is 1.0.If the second argument is 1.0, then the result is the same as the first argument.If the second argument is NaN, then the result is NaN.If the first argument is NaN and the second argument is nonzero, then the result is NaN.If the absolute value of the first argument is greater than 1 and the second argument is positive infinity, orthe absolute value of the first argument is less than 1 and the second argument is negative infinity,then the result is positive infinity.If the absolute value of the first argument is greater than 1 and the second argument is negative infinity, orthe absolute value of the first argument is less than 1 and the second argument is positive infinity,then the result is positive zero.If the absolute value of the first argument equals 1 and the second argument is infinite, then the result is NaN.If the first argument is positive zero and the second argument is greater than zero, orthe first argument is positive infinity and the second argument is less than zero,then the result is positive zero.If the first argument is positive zero and the second argument is less than zero, orthe first argument is positive infinity and the second argument is greater than zero,then the result is positive infinity.If the first argument is negative zero and the second argument is greater than zero but not a finite odd integer, orthe first argument is negative infinity and the second argument is less than zero but not a finite odd integer,then the result is positive zero.If the first argument is negative zero and the second argument is a positive finite odd integer, orthe first argument is negative infinity and the second argument is a negative finite odd integer,then the result is negative zero.If the first argument is negative zero and the second argument is less than zero but not a finite odd integer, orthe first argument is negative infinity and the second argument is greater than zero but not a finite odd integer,then the result is positive infinity.If the first argument is negative zero and the second argument is a negative finite odd integer, orthe first argument is negative infinity and the second argument is a positive finite odd integer,then the result is negative infinity.If the first argument is finite and less than zero if the second argument is a finite even integer, the result is equal to the result of raising the absolute value of the first argument to the power of the second argumentif the second argument is a finite odd integer, the result is equal to the negative of the result of raising the absolute value of the first argument to the power of the second argumentif the second argument is finite and not an integer, then the result is NaN.If both arguments are integers, then the result is exactly equal to the mathematical result of raising the first argument to the power of the second argument if that result can in fact be represented exactly as a double value.(In the foregoing descriptions, a floating-point value is considered to be an integer if and only if it is finite and a fixed point of the method ceil or, equivalently, a fixed point of the method floor. A value is a fixed point of a one-argument method if and only if the result of applying the method to the value is equal to the value.)A result must be within 1 ulp of the correctly rounded result. Results must be semi-monotonic.Parameters:a - the base.b - the exponent.Returns:the value ab.Taken from the Java api.

Anecdotal argument is more intimate and less formal compared to logical or empirical argument. It relies on personal experiences, stories, or examples to make a point, connecting with the audience on a more emotional level. It is often used in casual conversations or personal narratives.

There is no evidence in the argument to limit the number of tourists in Antarctica.

Habitats will be destroyed and less trees to take in carbon dioxide from the air

Most Middle Eastern Conflicts are quite young, as in less than 100 years old, but come from older grievances that were exacerbated by colonization.

it can be less threatening and more personal for the reader.