0
What else can I help you with?
Settle conflicts between states and make agreements with other nations?
Congress under the Articles of Confederation could
Is this true of false duringh the reigh of terror revolutionary courts were establised to settle property disputes between the church and state?
False
Who has the power to settle disputes in the US?
In the United States, the Supreme Court is vested with the power to settle disputes. The Supreme Court was established in Article III of the U.S. Constitution.
In what ways were Jay's treaty and Pinckney's and treaty similar?
They both settle disputes between or on a land. Differnce is that they dispute on different types of land.
Who has the power to settle disputes between the states?
The US Supreme Court is the only federal court that hears cases involving disputes between the states.According to Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution, the US Supreme Court, head of the Judicial Branch, has original jurisdiction over cases involving disputes between the states. At present, this power is exclusive to the Supreme Court.
How did the articles of confederation interfere with interstate commerce?
The Articles of Confederation had the power to settle disputes between states, but let the states make their own constitution/laws
When there is a dispute between states and the federal government over authority who has the authority to settle that dispute?
If there are disputes over authority between local, state, or the national government, how are the disputes resolved?
What was the first constitution called and why did it not work?
The Articles of Confederation didn't work because it made the federal government too weak, so it wasn't well funded and couldn't settle state disputes.
Why do people need courts?
To settle disputes and to enforce laws.To settle disputes and to enforce laws.To settle disputes and to enforce laws.To settle disputes and to enforce laws.
In which form of government does religious law settle disputes and rule the people?
Theocracy.
What was the purpose of the hague tribunal?
it is used to settle disputes between countries.
Why was it difficult or impossible for the government to settle disputes between states or between citizens of different states?
The government faced difficulties in settling disputes between states or between citizens of different states primarily due to the lack of a strong central authority under the Articles of Confederation, which limited its ability to enforce laws and adjudicate conflicts. Additionally, each state had its own laws and interests, leading to varying interpretations and biases in disputes. The absence of a federal judiciary further complicated matters, as there was no neutral body to resolve conflicts effectively. These factors contributed to a fragmented legal landscape that hindered effective dispute resolution.
Does to mediate mean to settle disputes?
Mediate is to be in the middle. A mediator sits between two parties.
How were disputes between states settled during 1783-1791?
The answer is probably supposed to be "because the Articles of Confederation didn't include a judicial branch or federal court system." Although this is true, the Articles of Confederation did provide a means of resolving disputes between states. Under Article 9, this authority was granted to Congress, which was instructed to select a panel of judges to help make a fair decision.
Which power involves the authority to interpret the laws and to settle disputes between members of society?
Judicial Power
What mechanism is used to settle disputes between the national and sub national levels of government in the United State's federal system?
In the United States' federal system, disputes between national and sub-national levels of government are primarily settled through judicial review by the Supreme Court. The Court interprets the Constitution and federal laws, determining the limits of state and federal authority. Additionally, conflicts can be addressed through legislative measures or negotiations between different levels of government. Ultimately, the judiciary serves as the final arbiter in resolving these disputes.
The Kellogg-Briand Pact was designed to abolish the possibility of war and settle international disputes peacefully?
Use of war to settle disputes
